Richaud de Minzi María Cristina, Sacchi Carla
Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental (CIIPME-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Psychol Rep. 2005 Oct;97(2):405-18. doi: 10.2466/pr0.97.2.405-418.
Whether people cope differently with negative events at different ages was assessed by relation to age by type of situation perceived as potentially stressful and by type of coping strategy used, and also whether the kind of coping strategy used to reduce the potential stressor was related to type of stressor. To do this the factor structure of the Spanish version of the Ways of Coping Checklist of Lazarus and Folkman was examined in an Argentine sample of 153. The factor analysis of checklist scores identified five factors: Cognitive redefinition, Problem focus, Seeking social support, Wishful thinking, and Avoidance. For two groups, ages 20 to 24 and 40 to 45 years, analysis indicated a significant association of type of situation perceived as potentially stressful with age. The middle-age group (40-45 yr.) chose a way of coping in problem solution but the young adult group (20-24 yr.) seemed more often to elude problems. It appears that the type of stressor influences type of coping.
通过将所感知到的潜在压力情境类型、所采用的应对策略类型与年龄联系起来,研究人们在不同年龄阶段应对负面事件的方式是否存在差异,同时研究用于减轻潜在压力源的应对策略类型是否与压力源类型相关。为此,在一个由153名阿根廷人组成的样本中,对拉扎勒斯和福克曼的应对方式清单西班牙语版本的因子结构进行了研究。清单分数的因子分析确定了五个因子:认知重新定义、问题聚焦、寻求社会支持、如意算盘和回避。对于20至24岁和40至45岁这两个年龄组,分析表明所感知到的潜在压力情境类型与年龄之间存在显著关联。中年组(40 - 45岁)选择问题解决的应对方式,但年轻成年组(20 - 24岁)似乎更常回避问题。看来压力源类型会影响应对方式。