Suppr超能文献

关于气管内吸痰的临床判断:儿科重症监护专家护士会考虑哪些线索?

Clinical judgments about endotracheal suctioning: what cues do expert pediatric critical care nurses consider?

作者信息

Thomas Margot, Fothergill-Bourbonnais Frances

机构信息

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;17(4):329-40, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2005.08.002.

Abstract

Making accurate and timely judgments based on multiple ways of knowing is an essential skill in critical care nursing practice. Studies have proposed that positive patient outcomes are linked to expert judgments in a variety of critical care situations; however, little is known about clinical judgments related to specific critical care nursing interventions. This article presents a qualitative nursing research study which examined the cues that expert pediatric critical care nurses used in making clinical judgments about suctioning intubated and ventilated, critically ill children. The participants' words and actions attest that the 'sensing' and 'thinking' of the process of cue use, are interwoven with, and integral to, the 'doing,' which is the process of skilled performance.

摘要

基于多种认知方式做出准确及时的判断是重症护理实践中的一项基本技能。研究表明,在各种重症护理情况下,积极的患者预后与专家判断相关;然而,对于与特定重症护理干预措施相关的临床判断却知之甚少。本文介绍了一项定性护理研究,该研究考察了儿科重症护理专家在对插管和通气的重症患儿进行吸痰临床判断时所使用的线索。参与者的言语和行动证明,线索使用过程中的“感知”和“思考”与“行动”相互交织且不可或缺,而“行动”就是熟练操作的过程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验