Falliner A, Schwinzer D, Hahne H-J, Hedderich J, Hassenpflug J
Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Michaelisstrasse 1, D-24105 Kiel, Germany.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jan;88(1):104-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16419.
In a prospective study, 232 neonates were examined sonographically using the methods of Graf and Terjesen. In order to determine the reproducibility of the methods, 50 hips were evaluated by two skilled examiners. In an inter-observer study, five physicians and five medical students evaluated 24 images, which were evaluated on ten occasions at two-weekly intervals by one of the authors. Statistical evaluation used the Bland-Altman approach. The neonates (110 females, 122 males) were less than four days old. The mean alpha angle was 62.4 degrees and mean femoral head cover was 55.4%. According to Graf's method, 1.3% of hips were pathological, compared with 4.1% according to Terjesen. Spearman's correlation coefficient between femoral head cover and alpha angles was 0.552. The Bland-Altman approach shows greater variation for femoral head cover than for alpha, if measured by experienced examiners. The Bland-Altman approach shows almost equal reproducibility for alpha and femoral head cover in the inter-observer test, but better repeatability for alpha in the intra-observer test. The Graf results relate better than Terjesen's to the well-known frequency of 1% to 2% hip dysplasia in the European population. Kappa statistics indicate a fair agreement between the two methods. Inter-observer evaluation shows an equal reproducibility of both methods, whereas intra-observer tests reveal better repeatability with Graf's method.
在一项前瞻性研究中,使用格拉夫(Graf)和特尔耶森(Terjesen)的方法对232例新生儿进行了超声检查。为了确定这些方法的可重复性,由两名技术熟练的检查人员对50个髋关节进行了评估。在一项观察者间研究中,五名医生和五名医学生对24张图像进行了评估,其中一名作者每隔两周对这些图像进行了十次评估。统计评估采用布兰德-奥特曼(Bland-Altman)方法。这些新生儿(110名女性,122名男性)年龄小于4天。平均α角为62.4度,平均股骨头覆盖率为55.4%。根据格拉夫的方法,1.3%的髋关节为病理性,而根据特尔耶森的方法这一比例为4.1%。股骨头覆盖率与α角之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数为0.552。如果由经验丰富的检查人员进行测量,布兰德-奥特曼方法显示股骨头覆盖率的变异比α角更大。在观察者间测试中,布兰德-奥特曼方法显示α角和股骨头覆盖率的可重复性几乎相同,但在观察者内测试中α角的重复性更好。与欧洲人群中1%至2%的髋关节发育不良的已知频率相比,格拉夫的结果比特尔耶森的结果相关性更好。卡帕统计表明两种方法之间有较好的一致性。观察者间评估显示两种方法的可重复性相同,而观察者内测试显示格拉夫的方法重复性更好。