Schmassmann Adrian, Zoidl Georg, Peskar Brigitta M, Waser Bea, Schmassmann-Suhijar Diana, Gebbers Jan-Olaf, Reubi Jean Claude
Department of Clinical Research, University of Berne, Switzerland.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006 Apr;290(4):G747-56. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00416.2005. Epub 2005 Dec 22.
Traditional NSAIDs, selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, and inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) impair the healing of preexisting gastric ulcers. However, the role of COX-1 (with or without impairment of COX-2) and the interaction between COX and NOS isoforms during healing are less clear. Thus we investigated healing and regulation of COX and NOS isoforms during ulcer healing in COX-1 and COX-2 deficiency and inhibition mouse models. In this study, female wild-type COX-1(-/-) and COX-2(-/-) mice with gastric ulcers induced by cryoprobe were treated intragastrically with vehicle, selective COX-1 (SC-560), COX-2 (celecoxib, rofecoxib, and valdedoxib), and unselective COX (piroxicam) inhibitors. Ulcer healing parameters, mRNA expression, and activity of COX and NOS were quantified. Gene disruption or inhibition of COX-1 did not impair ulcer healing. In contrast, COX-2 gene disruption and COX-2 inhibitors moderately impaired wound healing. More severe healing impairment was found in dual (SC-560 + rofecoxib) and unselective (piroxicam) COX inhibition and combined COX impairment (in COX-1(-/-) mice with COX-2 inhibition and COX-2(-/-) mice with COX-1 inhibition). In the ulcerated repair tissue, COX-2 mRNA in COX-1(-/-) mice, COX-1 mRNA in COX-2(-/-) mice, and, remarkably, NOS-2 and NOS-3 mRNA in COX-impaired mice were more upregulated than in wild-type mice. This study demonstrates that COX-2 is a key mediator in gastric wound healing. In contrast, COX-1 has no significant role in healing when COX-2 is unimpaired but becomes important when COX-2 is impaired. As counterregulatory mechanisms, mRNA of COX and NOS isoforms were increased during healing in COX-impaired mice.
传统非甾体抗炎药、选择性环氧化酶(COX)-2抑制剂以及一氧化氮合酶(NOS)抑制剂会损害已有的胃溃疡愈合。然而,COX-1(无论COX-2是否受损)的作用以及愈合过程中COX与NOS亚型之间的相互作用尚不清楚。因此,我们在COX-1和COX-2缺陷及抑制小鼠模型中研究了溃疡愈合过程中COX和NOS亚型的愈合及调节情况。在本研究中,用冷冻探头诱导患有胃溃疡的雌性野生型COX-1(-/-)和COX-2(-/-)小鼠经胃给予赋形剂、选择性COX-1(SC-560)、COX-2(塞来昔布、罗非昔布和伐地昔布)以及非选择性COX(吡罗昔康)抑制剂。对溃疡愈合参数、COX和NOS的mRNA表达及活性进行定量分析。COX-1基因敲除或抑制并不损害溃疡愈合。相反,COX-2基因敲除和COX-2抑制剂会中度损害伤口愈合。在双重(SC-560 + 罗非昔布)和非选择性(吡罗昔康)COX抑制以及联合COX损害(COX-1(-/-)小鼠中抑制COX-2以及COX-2(-/-)小鼠中抑制COX-1)时发现更严重的愈合损害。在溃疡修复组织中,COX-1(-/-)小鼠中的COX-2 mRNA、COX-2(-/-)小鼠中的COX-1 mRNA,以及值得注意的是,COX受损小鼠中的NOS-2和NOS-3 mRNA比野生型小鼠上调得更多。本研究表明,COX-2是胃伤口愈合的关键介质。相反,当COX-2未受损时,COX-1在愈合中无显著作用,但当COX-2受损时则变得重要。作为反调节机制,COX受损小鼠在愈合过程中COX和NOS亚型的mRNA增加。