Neo B J, Soh M S, Teo J W, Yap Adrian U J
Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore.
Oper Dent. 2005 Nov-Dec;30(6):671-5.
This study investigated the use of various light-curing regimens with standardized light energy density on the effectiveness of cure of a visible light activated resin composite (Z100, 3M-ESPE). A light-cure unit (Variable Intensity Polymerizer (VIP), BISCO Inc) which permitted individual control over time and intensity, was used. The five light-curing modes investigated include Pulse Delay (PD), Pulse Cure (PC), Soft-start (SS), Turbo (T) and Control (C). Effectiveness of cure was established by measuring the top and bottom Knoop hardness of 2-mm thick composite specimens using a digital microhardness tester (n=5, load=500g; dwell time=15 seconds) immediately and at one-day post-polymerization. Data obtained was analyzed using one-way ANOVA/Scheffe's post hoc test and Independent Samples t-tests (p<0.05). Top KHN observed immediately after polymerization with C was significantly lower than PD. At one day post-polymerization, the top KHN obtained with C was significantly lower than PD, SS and T. No significant difference in bottom KHN was observed among the different curing modes immediately after curing. At one day post-polymerization, the bottom KHN obtained with C was significantly lower than SS and T. Regardless of curing regimens, top and bottom values at one day were significantly higher than those observed immediately after light polymerization. No significant difference in mean hardness ratio was observed among the different curing regimens immediately and one day later. Effectiveness of the cure at the bottom surfaces of composites may be increased by soft-start and turbo polymerization regimens.
本研究调查了使用具有标准化光能密度的各种光固化方案对一种可见光活化树脂复合材料(Z100,3M-ESPE)固化效果的影响。使用了一种光固化单元(可变强度聚合器(VIP),BISCO公司),该单元允许对时间和强度进行单独控制。所研究的五种光固化模式包括脉冲延迟(PD)、脉冲固化(PC)、软启动(SS)、Turbo(T)和对照(C)。通过使用数字显微硬度测试仪(n = 5,载荷 = 500g;保压时间 = 15秒)在聚合后立即和聚合一天后测量2毫米厚复合材料试样的顶部和底部努氏硬度来确定固化效果。对获得的数据使用单因素方差分析/谢费尔事后检验和独立样本t检验进行分析(p < 0.05)。聚合后立即用C模式观察到的顶部努氏硬度显著低于PD模式。在聚合一天后,用C模式获得的顶部努氏硬度显著低于PD、SS和T模式。固化后立即观察到不同固化模式之间底部努氏硬度没有显著差异。在聚合一天后,用C模式获得的底部努氏硬度显著低于SS和T模式。无论固化方案如何,一天后的顶部和底部值均显著高于光聚合后立即观察到的值。在不同固化方案之间,立即和一天后观察到的平均硬度比没有显著差异。软启动和Turbo聚合方案可能会提高复合材料底部表面的固化效果。