Suppr超能文献

基于向量的5电极12导联监测心电图(EASI)在诊断急性冠脉综合征方面等同于传统12导联心电图。

A vector-based, 5-electrode, 12-lead monitoring ECG (EASI) is equivalent to conventional 12-lead ECG for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes.

作者信息

Wehr Gabriele, Peters Ron J, Khalifé Khalifé, Banning Adrian P, Kuehlkamp Volker, Rickards Anthony F, Sechtem Udo

机构信息

Robert Bosch Hospital Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2006 Jan;39(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.08.006. Epub 2005 Nov 16.

Abstract

AIMS

The conventional 12-lead electrocardiogram (cECG) derived from 10 electrodes using a cardiograph is the gold standard for diagnosing myocardial ischemia. This study tested the hypothesis that a new 5-electrode 12-lead vector-based ECG (EASI; Philips Medical Systems, formerly Hewlett Packard Co, Boeblingen, Germany) patient monitoring system is equivalent to cECG in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes (ACSs).

METHODS

Electrocardiograms (EASI and cECG) were obtained in 203 patients with chest pain on admission and 4 to 8 hours later. Both types of ECGs were graded as ST-elevation myocardial infarction if at least 1 of the 2 consecutive recordings showed ST elevation more than 0.2 mV, as ACS if one or both showed ST elevation less than 0.2 mV, T-wave inversion, or ST depression. Otherwise, the ECG was graded negative.

RESULTS

Final diagnosis was identical in 177 patients (87%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-91%; kappa = 0.81; SE = 0.035). ST-elevation myocardial infarction was correctly identified or excluded by EASI with a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 89%-97%) and a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 86%-97%; using cECG as the gold standard). Of 118 patients with enzyme elevations, an almost identical number (72 [61% by EASI] and 73 [62% by cECG]) had ST elevations. Both techniques were equivalent in predicting subsequent enzyme elevation (identical, 108/143; 75% of ACS and ST-elevation myocardial infarction ECGs by EASI and cECG). Thus, both ECG methods had exactly the same specificity of 59% (95% CI, 48%-69%) and sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 85%-96%) for detecting myocardial injury.

CONCLUSION

EASI is equivalent to cECG for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia.

摘要

目的

使用心电图仪从10个电极获取的传统12导联心电图(cECG)是诊断心肌缺血的金标准。本研究检验了以下假设:一种新型的基于5电极12导联向量的心电图(EASI;飞利浦医疗系统公司,前身为惠普公司,德国伯布林根)患者监测系统在诊断急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)方面与cECG等效。

方法

对203例胸痛患者入院时及4至8小时后进行心电图检查(EASI和cECG)。如果连续2次记录中至少有1次显示ST段抬高超过0.2 mV,则两种类型的心电图均分级为ST段抬高型心肌梗死;如果1次或2次均显示ST段抬高小于0.2 mV、T波倒置或ST段压低,则分级为ACS。否则,心电图分级为阴性。

结果

177例患者(87%;95%置信区间[CI],82%-91%;kappa = 0.81;标准误 = 0.035)的最终诊断相同。以cECG为金标准,EASI正确识别或排除ST段抬高型心肌梗死的特异性为94%(95% CI,89%-97%),敏感性为93%(95% CI,86%-97%)。在118例酶升高的患者中,ST段抬高的患者数量几乎相同(EASI检测为72例[61%],cECG检测为73例[62%])。两种技术在预测随后的酶升高方面等效(相同,108/143;EASI和cECG检测的ACS和ST段抬高型心肌梗死心电图中有75%)。因此,两种心电图方法检测心肌损伤的特异性均为59%(95% CI,48%-69%),敏感性均为91%(95% CI,85%-96%)。

结论

EASI在诊断心肌缺血方面与cECG等效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验