Suppr超能文献

使用计算机模拟进化设计心肺复苏中胸部和腹部按压与减压的近最优波形

Design of near-optimal waveforms for chest and abdominal compression and decompression in CPR using computer-simulated evolution.

作者信息

Babbs Charles F

机构信息

Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Purdue University, 1246 Lynn Hall, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1246, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2006 Feb;68(2):277-93. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.06.025. Epub 2006 Jan 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To discover design principles underlying the optimal waveforms for external chest and abdominal compression and decompression during cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

METHOD

A 14-compartment mathematical model of the human cardiopulmonary system is used to test successive generations of randomly mutated external compression waveforms during cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Mutated waveforms that produced superior mean perfusion pressure became parents for the next generation. Selection was based upon either systemic perfusion pressure (SPP = thoracic aortic minus right atrial pressure) or upon coronary perfusion pressure (CPP = thoracic aortic pressure minus myocardial wall pressure). After simulations of 64,414 individual CPR episodes, 40 highly evolved waveforms were characterized in terms of frequency, duty cycle, and phase. A simple, practical compression technique was then designed by combining evolved features with a constant rate of 80 min(-1) and duty cycle of 50%.

RESULTS

All ultimate surviving waveforms included reciprocal compression and decompression of the chest and the abdomen to the maximum allowable extent. The evolved waveforms produced 1.5-3 times the mean perfusion pressure of standard CPR and greater perfusion pressure than other forms of modified CPR reported heretofore, including active compression-decompression (ACD)+ITV and interposed abdominal compression (IAC)-CPR. When SPP was maximized by evolution, the chest compression/abdominal decompression phase was near 70% of cycle time. When CPP was maximized, the abdominal compression/chest decompression phase was near 30% of cycle time. Near-maximal SPP/CPP of 60/21 mmHg (forward flow 3.8 L/min) occurred at a compromise compression frequency of 80 min(-1) and duty cycle for chest compression of 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimized waveforms for thoraco-abdominal compression and decompression include previously discovered features of active decompression and interposed abdominal compression. These waveforms can be used by manual (Lifestick-like) and mechanical (vest-like) devices to achieve short periods of near normal blood perfusion non-invasively during cardiac arrest.

摘要

目的

探寻心脏骤停和心肺复苏(CPR)期间用于胸外和腹部按压及减压的最佳波形背后的设计原则。

方法

使用人体心肺系统的14腔室数学模型,对心脏骤停和复苏期间连续几代随机突变的胸外按压波形进行测试。产生更高平均灌注压的突变波形成为下一代的亲本。选择基于全身灌注压(SPP = 胸主动脉压减去右心房压)或冠状动脉灌注压(CPP = 胸主动脉压减去心肌壁压)。在模拟了64414次个体CPR事件后,根据频率、占空比和相位对40个高度进化的波形进行了表征。然后通过将进化特征与80次/分钟的恒定速率和50%的占空比相结合,设计了一种简单、实用的按压技术。

结果

所有最终存活的波形都包括胸部和腹部在最大允许范围内的往复按压和减压。进化后的波形产生的平均灌注压是标准CPR的1.5至3倍,并且比迄今报道的其他形式的改良CPR产生的灌注压更高,包括主动按压-减压(ACD)+间歇性腹部按压(ITV)和插入式腹部按压(IAC)-CPR。当通过进化使SPP最大化时,胸部按压/腹部减压阶段接近周期时间的70%。当CPP最大化时,腹部按压/胸部减压阶段接近周期时间的30%。在80次/分钟的折衷按压频率和50%的胸部按压占空比下,出现了接近最大的SPP/CPP,分别为60/21 mmHg(前向血流3.8 L/分钟)。

结论

胸腹部按压和减压的优化波形包括先前发现的主动减压和插入式腹部按压的特征。这些波形可被手动(类似生命棒)和机械(类似背心)装置使用,以在心脏骤停期间非侵入性地实现短时间的接近正常的血液灌注。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验