North Alison J
J Cell Biol. 2006 Jan 2;172(1):9-18. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200507103.
Imaging can be thought of as the most direct of experiments. You see something; you report what you see. If only things were truly this simple. Modern imaging technology has brought about a revolution in the kinds of questions we can approach, but this comes at the price of increasingly complex equipment. Moreover, in an attempt to market competing systems, the microscopes have often been inappropriately described as easy to use and suitable for near-beginners. Insufficient understanding of the experimental manipulations and equipment set-up leads to the introduction of errors during image acquisition. In this feature, I review some of the most common practical pitfalls faced by researchers during image acquisition, and how they can affect the interpretation of the experimental data. This article is targeted neither to the microscopy gurus who push forward the frontiers of imaging technology nor to my imaging specialist colleagues who may wince at the overly simplistic comments and lack of detail. Instead, this is for beginners who gulp with alarm when they hear the word "confocal pinhole" or sigh as they watch their cells fade and die in front of their very eyes time and time again at the microscope. Take heart, beginners, if microscopes were actually so simple then many people (including myself) would suddenly be out of a job!
成像可以被认为是最直接的实验方式。你看到某样东西,然后报告你所看到的。要是事情真有这么简单就好了。现代成像技术给我们能够探讨的问题类型带来了一场革命,但这是以设备日益复杂为代价的。此外,为了推销相互竞争的系统,显微镜常常被不恰当地描述为易于使用且适合近乎初学者。对实验操作和设备设置缺乏足够的了解会导致在图像采集过程中引入误差。在本专题中,我将回顾研究人员在图像采集过程中面临的一些最常见的实际陷阱,以及它们如何影响实验数据的解读。本文既不是针对推动成像技术前沿的显微镜专家,也不是针对可能会因过于简单化的评论和缺乏细节而蹙眉的我的成像专家同事。相反,这是为初学者而写的,当他们听到“共聚焦针孔”这个词时会惊恐地倒抽一口气,或者当他们在显微镜下一次次眼睁睁看着自己的细胞逐渐褪色死亡时会连连叹息。初学者们,振作起来,如果显微镜真的那么简单,那么很多人(包括我自己)都会突然失业了!