Lees-Haley Paul R, Rohling Martin L, Langhinrichsen-Rohling Jennifer
Independent Practice, Huntsville, AL 35805, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Feb;20(1):90-107. doi: 10.1080/13854040500203274.
This article reports a meta-analysis of 25 samples in 20 peer-reviewed published neuropsychological studies of the cognitive, psychological, motor, and sensory/perceptual effects of exposure to manganese. These studies included 1,410 exposed participants and 1,322 controls, for a total N = 2,732. Studies were excluded from this analysis if they were unpublished, had uncodeable data, were based on fewer than four participants, failed to have a comparison group, or reported on manganese effects other than cognitive or sensory/motor (e.g., liver functioning). Because the independent variables defining manganese exposure varied across studies, effect sizes were calculated for exposed versus non-exposed workers. Dose-response relations were considered for measures of manganese levels in air/dust (84% of studies reported), blood (MnB; 76% reported), urine (MnU; 52% reported), and hair samples (4% reported). Level of exposure was also estimated by reported years of exposure (M = 13.1 years). Cohen's d statistic yielded a statistically significant weighted mean effect size of - .17, p < .0001 for manganese exposure. However, an effect this small is typically undetectable when evaluating individuals because it is smaller (about 1/6 SD) than the confidence intervals of most neuropsychological measures. Because the effect is so slight and the overlap so great between exposed and unexposed participants (87%), the error rate would exceed the hit rate if causal conclusions were rendered for occupational exposure to manganese as the source of an individual's cognitive, sensory, or motor impairments based on neuropsychological testing or symptom reports.
本文报告了一项荟萃分析,该分析涵盖了20项经过同行评审并发表的神经心理学研究中的25个样本,这些研究探讨了接触锰对认知、心理、运动以及感觉/知觉方面的影响。这些研究包括1410名接触锰的参与者和1322名对照组,样本总数N = 2732。若研究未发表、数据无法编码、参与者少于四人、没有对照组或者报告的是除认知或感觉/运动之外的锰的影响(例如肝功能),则将其排除在本分析之外。由于不同研究中定义锰接触的自变量各不相同,因此计算了接触组与未接触组工人之间的效应量。对于空气/粉尘中的锰水平测量值(84%的研究报告了该数据)、血液中的锰(MnB;76%的研究报告了该数据)、尿液中的锰(MnU;52%的研究报告了该数据)以及头发样本中的锰(4%的研究报告了该数据),均考虑了剂量反应关系。接触水平也通过报告的接触年限进行估计(M = 13.1年)。科恩d统计量得出,锰接触的加权平均效应量在统计学上具有显著意义,为 -0.17,p < 0.0001。然而,在评估个体时,如此小的效应通常难以察觉,因为它比大多数神经心理学测量的置信区间还要小(约为1/6标准差)。由于效应如此轻微,且接触组与未接触组参与者之间的重叠度如此之高(87%),如果基于神经心理学测试或症状报告,就职业接触锰作为个体认知、感觉或运动障碍的来源得出因果结论,那么错误率将会超过命中率。