Pumannova Marketa, Roubalova Katerina, Vitek Antonin, Sajdova Jana
National Institute of Public Health, 100 42, Prague, Czech Republic.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Feb;54(2):115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.08.021. Epub 2006 Jan 9.
Development of highly sensitive quantitative assays for cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA detection is crucial for identification of immunodeficient patients at high risk of CMV disease. We designed 2 internally controlled competitive quantitative assays, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, using amplification of the same segment of the CMV genome. The aim of this study was to compare sensitivity, specificity, and laboratory performance characteristics of these assays. In both assays, a 159-bp segment of UL83 gene was amplified. External and internal controls were constructed by cloning the amplification product and heterogenous DNA segment flanked by target sequences for CMV-derived primers into bacterial plasmids, respectively. Real-time PCR was performed on LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), and amplicons were detected using fluorescence resonance energy transfer probes. Alternatively, PCR products were labeled by digoxigenin, hybridized to immobilized probes, and detected by ELISA. The assays were tested on genomic DNA isolated from laboratory strains of CMV, QCMD control panel, and CMV DNA-positive peripheral blood DNA samples from hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, previously characterized by pp65 antigenemia and qualitative nested PCR. Real-time and ELISA-based PCR assays showed a linear course of 1-10(8) and 10-10(5) copies of CMV DNA per reaction, respectively. When compared with ELISA-based PCR, real-time PCR showed superiority in inter- and intra-assay reproducibility. Both assays were highly specific in detecting CMV DNA. No difference in amplification efficiency of internal or external standards and wild-type CMV DNA was found. The assays exhibited 83% concordance in CMV DNA detection from clinical samples, all discrepant samples having low CMV DNA copy numbers. There was a good correlation between viral DNA loads measured by the 2 assays. Statistically significant correlation was observed between the numbers of CMV DNA copies and pp65-positive leukocytes in the samples tested. Both variants of competitive PCR are adequately sensitive to be used for CMV DNA quantitation in clinical samples. LightCycler PCR, having superior performance characteristics and being less time-consuming, seems to be more suitable for routine diagnosis.
开发用于巨细胞病毒(CMV)DNA检测的高灵敏度定量检测方法对于识别有CMV疾病高风险的免疫缺陷患者至关重要。我们设计了2种内部对照竞争定量检测方法,即基于酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,使用CMV基因组同一段的扩增。本研究的目的是比较这些检测方法的灵敏度、特异性和实验室性能特征。在这两种检测方法中,均扩增UL83基因的159bp片段。通过分别将扩增产物和两侧带有CMV衍生引物靶序列的异源DNA片段克隆到细菌质粒中构建外部和内部对照。在LightCycler(德国曼海姆罗氏诊断公司)上进行实时PCR,并使用荧光共振能量转移探针检测扩增子。或者,PCR产物用地高辛标记,与固定化探针杂交,并通过ELISA检测。这些检测方法在从CMV实验室菌株、QCMD对照品以及造血干细胞移植受者的CMV DNA阳性外周血DNA样本中分离的基因组DNA上进行测试,这些样本先前已通过pp65抗原血症和定性巢式PCR进行了特征分析。实时和基于ELISA的PCR检测分别显示每个反应中CMV DNA的线性范围为1-10(8)和10-10(5)拷贝。与基于ELISA的PCR相比,实时PCR在批间和批内重复性方面表现更优。两种检测方法在检测CMV DNA时均具有高度特异性。未发现内部或外部标准品与野生型CMV DNA的扩增效率存在差异。这些检测方法在临床样本的CMV DNA检测中显示出83%的一致性,所有不一致的样本CMV DNA拷贝数均较低。两种检测方法测得的病毒DNA载量之间具有良好的相关性。在所测试的样本中,观察到CMV DNA拷贝数与pp65阳性白细胞数量之间存在统计学显著相关性。竞争PCR的两种变体对于临床样本中CMV DNA定量检测均具有足够的灵敏度。具有更优性能特征且耗时较少的LightCycler PCR似乎更适合常规诊断。