Suppr超能文献

不可治愈的食管癌:肿瘤扩散模式及治疗后果

Incurable esophageal cancer: patterns of tumor spread and therapeutic consequences.

作者信息

Gockel Ines, Kneist Werner, Junginger Theodor

机构信息

Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, Mainz, D-55101, Germany.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2006 Feb;30(2):183-90. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7861-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to determine if the two histologic tumor types in esophageal cancer exhibit different behavior at advanced tumour stages and require a differentiated therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From November 1997 to December 2003, 268 patients presented with esophageal carcinoma. Esophagectomy was contraindicated in 88 (32.8%) patients (75 men, 13 women) with a median age of 64.7 (42-83) years. Fifty-six (63.6%) had squamous cell carcinoma; adenocarcinoma was identified in 31 (35.2%).

RESULTS

The causes of incurable disease were non-resectable distant metastases in 32 (36.4%) patients, local tumor spread in 25 (28.4%), and general operative risk in 19 (21.5%). Surgical intervention was contraindicated in 7 patients because of a combination of general inoperability and local tumor spread, or the presence of distant metastases at the time of diagnosis (4 patients declined to undergo surgery and in one patient esophageal resection and reconstruction was technically not possible). The incurability rate for squamous cell carcinoma was 44.6% because of the presence of local tumor spread, compared to a rate of 12.4% for adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinomas with proven hematogenic metastases were characterized by a higher incurability rate (64.5% vs. 21.4%) (P=0.0014). The prevalence of technical causes of inoperability or of poor general condition was similar in both patient groups (P>0.05). The median 1-year survival rates estimated (Kaplan-Meier) were 36.5% for patients with squamous cell carcinoma and 23.7% for patients with adenocarcinoma (P=0.051). Therapeutic measures had a significant influence on the prognosis: patients without tumor-specific therapy survived 3.4 (0-24) months; those with radiochemotherapy 10.6 (0-25) months; those with radiotherapy 11.0 (0-65) months; and those with chemotherapy 16.5 [0-16.5] months (log-rank test: P=0.0229). In the multivariate analysis, the therapeutic measures (P=0.0126) and tumor localization (P=0.0474) proved significant for prognosis, but were not the cause of incurability (P=0.0948).

CONCLUSIONS

The histologic tumor type does not represent an independent prognostic factor in patients with incurable disease. Rather, the prognosis is dependent on the suitability of the induction of tumor-specific therapeutic measures. These are also recommended in patients with incurable disease after consideration of the extent of tumor spread, provided the performance of the selected measures is justified by the general condition of the patient and the expected prognosis.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是确定食管癌的两种组织学肿瘤类型在肿瘤晚期是否表现出不同的行为,以及是否需要差异化治疗。

患者与方法

1997年11月至2003年12月,268例患者被诊断为食管癌。88例(32.8%)患者(75例男性,13例女性)因禁忌证未行食管切除术,中位年龄为64.7岁(42 - 83岁)。其中56例(63.6%)为鳞状细胞癌;31例(35.2%)为腺癌。

结果

无法治愈的原因包括32例(36.4%)患者存在不可切除的远处转移、25例(28.4%)患者局部肿瘤扩散以及19例(21.5%)患者存在一般手术风险。7例患者因全身手术不可行和局部肿瘤扩散或诊断时存在远处转移而禁忌手术干预(4例患者拒绝手术,1例患者技术上无法进行食管切除和重建)。鳞状细胞癌因局部肿瘤扩散导致的无法治愈率为44.6%,而腺癌为12.4%。经证实有血行转移的腺癌患者的无法治愈率更高(64.5%对21.4%)(P = 0.0014)。两组患者手术不可行或全身状况差的技术原因发生率相似(P>0.05)。根据Kaplan - Meier法估计,鳞状细胞癌患者的1年中位生存率为36.5%,腺癌患者为23.7%(P = 0.051)。治疗措施对预后有显著影响:未接受肿瘤特异性治疗的患者存活3.4个月(0 - 24个月);接受放化疗的患者存活10.6个月(0 - 25个月);接受放疗的患者存活11.0个月(0 - 65个月);接受化疗的患者存活16.5个月(0 - 16.5个月)(对数秩检验:P = 0.0229)。多因素分析显示,治疗措施(P = 0.0126)和肿瘤定位(P = 0.0474)对预后有显著影响,但不是无法治愈的原因(P = 0.0948)。

结论

组织学肿瘤类型在无法治愈的患者中并非独立的预后因素。相反,预后取决于诱导肿瘤特异性治疗措施的适宜性。在考虑肿瘤扩散程度后,对于无法治愈的患者也建议采取这些措施,前提是所选措施的实施符合患者的一般状况和预期预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验