Zoccali Carmine, Testa Alessandra, Spoto Belinda, Tripepi Giovanni, Mallamaci Francesca
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche-Istituto di Biomedicina, Clinical Epidemiology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Reggio Cal, Italy.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Feb;47(2):332-41. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.10.027.
Associations between environmental exposures and disease in epidemiological studies often are confounded and may result in erroneous interpretations. The random assortment of genes from parents to offspring at gamete formation--Mendelian randomization--is emerging as a useful method for studying the nature (causal or not) of environmental exposures. This occurs because the association between a disease and a polymorphism that mimics the biological link between a given exposure and the same disease is unaffected by the reverse causation that may complicate the interpretation of observational studies. Thus, similarly to randomized trials, association studies between gene polymorphisms with a well-established function may be useful for excluding confounding as an explanation for a given epidemiological relationship. The rationale behind this concept is that transmission of genes occurs in a random way; therefore, offspring have an equal chance of inheriting either of the 2 alleles that their parents have at any particular locus, a phenomenon independent from environmental factors. This is similar to the construct of randomized trials, in which randomization is expected to produce similar distributions of measured and unmeasured confounders between treated and untreated (control) groups. The equivalence between random assortment of alleles and random assignment of interventions in randomized studies is particularly useful because it may give a clue for interpreting associations that may be produced as both the effect of a gene or result of an environmental exposure. Examples are provided about the use of this concept to elucidate paradoxical inverse associations in epidemiological studies in the general and end-stage renal disease populations.
在流行病学研究中,环境暴露与疾病之间的关联常常受到混杂因素的影响,可能导致错误的解释。在配子形成过程中,基因从父母向后代的随机分配——孟德尔随机化——正逐渐成为研究环境暴露本质(是否具有因果关系)的一种有用方法。之所以会这样,是因为疾病与模仿特定暴露和同一疾病之间生物学联系的多态性之间的关联不受反向因果关系的影响,而反向因果关系可能会使观察性研究的解释变得复杂。因此,与随机试验类似,对具有明确功能的基因多态性进行关联研究,可能有助于排除混杂因素作为特定流行病学关系的一种解释。这一概念背后的基本原理是基因的传递是随机发生的;因此,后代继承其父母在任何特定基因座上两个等位基因中任何一个的机会均等,这一现象独立于环境因素。这类似于随机试验的构建,在随机试验中,随机化预期会在治疗组和未治疗组(对照组)之间产生测量到的和未测量到的混杂因素的相似分布。等位基因的随机分配与随机研究中干预措施的随机分配之间的等效性特别有用,因为它可能为解释可能由基因效应或环境暴露结果产生的关联提供线索。文中给出了在一般人群和终末期肾病患者的流行病学研究中使用这一概念来阐明矛盾的反向关联的实例。