McKenna S L B, Barkema H W, Keefe G P, Sockett D C
Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PEI, Canada C1A 4P3.
Vet Microbiol. 2006 May 31;114(3-4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Jan 26.
During a 10-month period in 1999, 994 serum and tissue samples were collected from dairy cows at slaughter in eastern Canada. The sources of these cattle were from all four Atlantic Canadian provinces along with some cows from the state of Maine. The sera were used to assess the agreement of three commercially available ELISAs for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Two ELISAs were indirect absorbed ELISAs licensed for use in North America, the third was an indirect non-absorbed ELISA licensed for use in Europe. Overall, there was poor agreement between the three ELISAs. The highest and lowest kappa values were 0.33 and 0.18, which is fair and poor agreement, respectively. However, when only tissue culture-positive cattle were compared, the ELISAs had better agreement (kappa=0.37-0.51). The proportions of positive tests, however, were significantly different among the three ELISAs. The poor agreement among the three ELISAs is as concerning as the fact that these tests have low sensitivity. The implications are greatest when the tests are used at the cow level to make individual animal decisions, which is not the recommended method on the product labels. At the cow level, if the result obtained from one ELISA is positive, using a different ELISA in a pre-clinical animal has a high likelihood of giving a different result due to low predictive values of positive test results.
1999年的10个月期间,从加拿大东部屠宰的奶牛身上采集了994份血清和组织样本。这些牛来自加拿大大西洋沿岸的四个省份以及缅因州的一些奶牛。血清用于评估三种市售禽分枝杆菌副结核ELISA检测方法的一致性。两种ELISA是在北美获得许可使用的间接吸附ELISA,第三种是在欧洲获得许可使用的间接非吸附ELISA。总体而言,三种ELISA之间的一致性较差。最高和最低的kappa值分别为0.33和0.18,分别表示一致性一般和较差。然而,仅比较组织培养呈阳性的牛时,ELISA之间的一致性更好(kappa = 0.37 - 0.51)。然而,三种ELISA检测呈阳性的比例存在显著差异。三种ELISA之间的一致性差与这些检测方法灵敏度低的事实同样令人担忧。当这些检测方法用于奶牛个体以做出个体动物决策时,影响最大,而这并非产品标签上推荐的方法。在奶牛层面,如果一种ELISA检测结果为阳性,由于阳性检测结果的预测价值低,在临床前动物中使用不同的ELISA很可能会得出不同的结果。