Shadmi Efrat, Boyd Cynthia M, Hsiao Chun-Ju, Sylvia Martha, Schuster Alyson B, Boult Chad
Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Feb;54(2):330-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00578.x.
To quantify the association between community-dwelling older persons' level of morbidity and their perceptions of the quality of their primary care.
Cross-sectional study.
Urban primary care practice.
A sample of community-dwelling members of a capitated health plan aged 65 and older who were patients of four general internists in one urban practice (N = 120).
The Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups case-mix system was used to designate a person's aggregate morbidity level as moderate or high depending on the number and types of chronic conditions they had. Aspects of quality of primary care (physician-patient communication, interpersonal treatment, knowledge of patient, integration of care, and trust in physician) were assessed using the Primary Care Assessment Survey.
All participants were classified as having moderate (41%) or high morbidity (59%). Older adults with high morbidity assigned a lower rating to all aspects of quality of primary care (physician-patient communication (P = .001), interpersonal treatment (P = .002), knowledge of patient (P = .03), integration of care (P = .004), and trust in physician (P = .01)) than those with moderate morbidity. The differences in quality of primary care remained statistically significant after controlling for age, sex, race, and education level.
Older persons with multiple chronic conditions report inadequate quality of primary care and dissatisfaction with their care. Those with high morbidity levels experience poorer quality of primary care than those with moderate morbidity in all five aspects measured here.
量化社区居住的老年人的发病水平与其对初级保健质量的认知之间的关联。
横断面研究。
城市初级保健机构。
一个按人头付费的健康计划中年龄在65岁及以上的社区居住成员样本,他们是一名城市医疗机构中四位普通内科医生的患者(N = 120)。
使用约翰霍普金斯调整临床分组病例组合系统,根据他们所患慢性病的数量和类型,将一个人的总体发病水平指定为中度或高度。使用初级保健评估调查评估初级保健质量的各个方面(医患沟通、人际治疗、对患者的了解、护理整合以及对医生的信任)。
所有参与者被分类为中度发病(41%)或高度发病(59%)。与中度发病的老年人相比,高度发病的老年人对初级保健质量的所有方面(医患沟通(P = .001)、人际治疗(P = .002)、对患者的了解(P = .03)、护理整合(P = .004)以及对医生的信任(P = .01))的评分较低。在控制了年龄、性别、种族和教育水平后,初级保健质量的差异在统计学上仍然显著。
患有多种慢性病的老年人报告初级保健质量不足且对其护理不满意。在此测量的所有五个方面中,高度发病的老年人比中度发病的老年人经历的初级保健质量更差。