Suppr超能文献

[卫生经济学与卫生技术评估]

[Health economics and HTA].

作者信息

Kulp W, Greiner W

机构信息

Universität Hannover.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2006 Mar;49(3):257-63. doi: 10.1007/s00103-005-1228-x.

Abstract

For a comprehensive health technology assessment (HTA), health economic studies are analysed as well as medical studies. Significance and effects of HTA are rather different in European countries. In Germany HTA is conducted by two official agencies: DIMDI and IQWiG. While DIMDI requires health economic assessments, IQWiG is prohibited from considering economic aspects by law (pure assessment of benefits). For the health economic assessment in HTA reports mainly secondary scientific evidence is exploited, i.e. primarily cost effectiveness and cost utility analyses. The study perspective, the study alternatives and the modelling methods are of great importance for the evaluation and have to be justified in depth. The cost effectiveness ratio and the budget impact are the most important results of the health economic assessment, which is the basis for the appraisal by the health care authorities. For this decision medical, utilitarian or other aspects like the avoidance of unwanted distribution effects are considered. On the other hand often only a few studies are available for the decision making when the appraisal has to be done. This problem might be less relevant in the near future as the number of HTAs and the number of health economic evaluations increases.

摘要

对于全面的卫生技术评估(HTA),既要分析卫生经济学研究,也要分析医学研究。HTA在欧洲国家的意义和影响差异颇大。在德国,HTA由两个官方机构开展:德国医学信息研究所(DIMDI)和德国卫生质量与效率研究所(IQWiG)。虽然DIMDI要求进行卫生经济评估,但法律禁止IQWiG考虑经济方面(纯粹的效益评估)。在HTA报告的卫生经济评估中,主要利用的是二级科学证据,即主要是成本效益分析和成本效用分析。研究视角、研究方案和建模方法对于评估至关重要,必须进行深入论证。成本效益比和预算影响是卫生经济评估的最重要结果,这是卫生保健当局进行评估的基础。对于这一决策,要考虑医学、功利主义或其他方面,比如避免不良分配效应。另一方面,在进行评估时,决策往往只能依据少数研究。随着HTA数量和卫生经济评估数量的增加,这个问题在不久的将来可能就没那么重要了。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验