McCallister Wren V, Ambrose Heidi C, Katolik Leonid I, Trumble Thomas E
University of Washington Hand Center, Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Feb;31(2):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.10.020.
To evaluate the clinical outcome after repair of zone I flexor tendon injuries using either the pullout button technique or suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx.
Between 1998 and 2002 we treated 26 consecutive zone I flexor tendon injuries. Thirteen patients had repairs from 1998 to 2000 using a modified pullout button technique (group A) and 13 patients had repair using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx (group B). Patient characteristics were similar for both groups. The same postoperative flexor tendon rehabilitation protocol and follow-up schedule were used for both groups. Evaluation included range of motion, sensibility and grip strength, failure, complications, and return to work. The Student t test was used to determine significant differences.
All patients completed 1 year of follow-up evaluation. There were 2 infections in group A that resolved with oral antibiotics and no infections in group B. There were no tendon repair failures and no repeat surgeries in either group. At final follow-up evaluation there were no statistically significant differences for the following end points: sensibility (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing and 2-point discrimination), active range of motion (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined motion), flexion contracture (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined contracture), and grip strength (injured tendon as a percent of the contralateral uninjured tendon). The suture anchor group had a statistically significant improvement for time to return to work.
There was no significant difference in the clinical outcome after flexor tendon repair using either suture anchors or the pullout button technique. A significant improvement was found for time to return to work for repairs using the suture anchor technique. Flexor tendon repair can be achieved using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx, thereby avoiding the potential morbidity associated with the pullout button technique.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.
评估采用拉出纽扣技术或在远节指骨置入缝线锚钉修复Ⅰ区屈指肌腱损伤后的临床疗效。
1998年至2002年间,我们连续治疗了26例Ⅰ区屈指肌腱损伤患者。1998年至2000年,13例患者采用改良拉出纽扣技术进行修复(A组),13例患者采用在远节指骨置入缝线锚钉进行修复(B组)。两组患者的特征相似。两组均采用相同的术后屈指肌腱康复方案和随访计划。评估内容包括活动范围、感觉和握力、失败情况、并发症以及重返工作岗位情况。采用学生t检验确定显著差异。
所有患者均完成了1年的随访评估。A组有2例感染,经口服抗生素后痊愈,B组无感染。两组均未出现肌腱修复失败及再次手术情况。在最终随访评估中,以下终点指标无统计学显著差异:感觉(Semmes-Weinstein单丝试验和两点辨别觉)、主动活动范围(近端指间关节、远端指间关节或其联合活动)、屈曲挛缩(近端指间关节、远端指间关节或其联合挛缩)以及握力(患侧肌腱相对于对侧未受伤肌腱的百分比)。缝线锚钉组在重返工作岗位的时间上有统计学显著改善。
采用缝线锚钉或拉出纽扣技术修复屈指肌腱后的临床疗效无显著差异。采用缝线锚钉技术修复后重返工作岗位的时间有显著改善。可通过在远节指骨置入缝线锚钉实现屈指肌腱修复,从而避免与拉出纽扣技术相关的潜在并发症。
研究类型/证据水平:治疗性研究,Ⅲ级。