Kuijer W, Brouwer S, Preuper H R Schiphorst, Groothoff J W, Geertzen J H B, Dijkstra P U
Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Mar 30;28(6):379-88. doi: 10.1080/09638280500287635.
Exploring which variables are related to work status in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), classified according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
Ninety-two patients with CLBP filled out questionnaires inquiring after health status, impairments in body functions/structures, limitations in activities of daily living (ADL), participation in work, environmental and personal factors. Additionally, patients performed tests to measure physical fitness and performance of work-related activities. Univariate analyses were performed to investigate whether differences exist between working and non-working patients. Logistic linear regression analysis was performed to explain work status from the variables of functioning.
Non-working patients had a lower self-reported physical and mental health, lower physical fitness, more self-reported limitations in ADL, lower education, more depressive symptoms and higher psycho neuroticism than working patients. Self-reported physical and mental health and educational level correctly classified 84.5% of the patients as working or non-working. Performance of work-related activities was not significantly related with work-status.
The relation between work status and CLBP is multidimensional, as was illustrated by using the bio-psychosocial model of the ICF. Patients with a low educational level, a low self-reported physical or mental health were more likely to be non-working. Self-reported limitations and physical and mental health are more important in explaining work status than objective measurements of performance.
根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF),探究慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者中哪些变量与工作状态相关。
92例CLBP患者填写了关于健康状况、身体功能/结构损伤、日常生活活动(ADL)受限、工作参与情况、环境和个人因素的问卷。此外,患者还进行了测量身体素质和与工作相关活动表现的测试。进行单因素分析以调查在职和非在职患者之间是否存在差异。进行逻辑线性回归分析以从功能变量解释工作状态。
与在职患者相比,非在职患者自我报告的身心健康状况较差、身体素质较低、自我报告的ADL受限更多、教育程度较低、抑郁症状更多且精神神经质程度更高。自我报告的身心健康状况和教育水平将84.5%的患者正确分类为在职或非在职。与工作相关活动的表现与工作状态无显著关联。
如使用ICF的生物心理社会模型所示,工作状态与CLBP之间的关系是多维度的。教育水平低、自我报告的身心健康状况差的患者更有可能不工作。在解释工作状态方面,自我报告的受限情况以及身心健康状况比客观的表现测量更为重要。