Mayinger Brigitte, Oezturk Yurdagül, Stolte Manfred, Faller Gerhard, Benninger Johannes, Schwab Dieter, Maiss Juergen, Hahn Eckhart G, Muehldorfer Steffen
Department of Medicine I, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;41(3):349-56. doi: 10.1080/00365520510024016.
Magnification endoscopy with acetic acid or dye for diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus is presently undergoing clinical evaluation. Current studies report good accuracy in predicting specialized intestinal metaplasia. To date, however, there is no definitive information on the inter- and intra-observer variability of these methods applied to the diagnosis of normal and dysplastic Barrett's mucosa.
Sixty patients with endoscopically suspected Barrett's esophagus were investigated prospectively with the zoom endoscope after contrast enhancement of the mucosa with 1.5% acetic acid. Two hundred and twenty-three enlarged and histologically investigated areas of gastric, cardiac, normal and dysplastic Barrett's mucosa were photodocumented and in randomized sequence presented to 4 endoscopists in a blinded manner (2 with and 2 without experience of zoom endoscopy for evaluation). The reference for the first evaluation (A1) was standard endoscopic photographs of the respective, histologically confirmed mucosal entity. In a second evaluation (A2), the pictures were again interpreted by the same blinded investigators, but this time a modified pit-pattern classification as proposed by Sharma et al. was employed as the evaluation reference.
The diagnostic sensitivity for specialized intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus calculated for the A1 evaluation ranged -- investigator dependently -- from 54.9% to 80.7% and for A2 from 42.2% to 81.5%. The inter- and intra-observer variability for the evaluation procedure A1 and A2 was high (all kappa values <0.4). In particular, the inexperienced investigators demonstrated high intra-observer variability and low sensitivity in comparison with the experienced investigators.
The diagnosis of Barrett's mucosa using enhanced magnification endoscopy after acetic acid instillation is associated with a high level of interobserver variability. One reason is a frequent mismatch between cardiac mucosa and non-dysplastic Barrett's mucosa.
目前,使用乙酸或染料的放大内镜检查用于诊断巴雷特食管正在进行临床评估。当前研究报告称在预测特殊肠化生方面具有良好的准确性。然而,迄今为止,关于这些方法应用于诊断正常和发育异常的巴雷特黏膜时观察者间和观察者内的变异性,尚无确切信息。
对60例内镜检查怀疑为巴雷特食管的患者进行前瞻性研究,先用1.5%乙酸对黏膜进行对比增强,然后使用变焦内镜进行检查。对223个经放大并进行组织学检查的胃、贲门、正常和发育异常的巴雷特黏膜区域进行拍照记录,并以随机顺序以盲法呈现给4位内镜医师(其中2位有变焦内镜检查经验,2位没有)进行评估。首次评估(A1)的参考标准是各自经组织学证实的黏膜实体的标准内镜照片。在第二次评估(A2)中,相同的盲法研究者再次解读这些图片,但这次采用了夏尔马等人提出的改良凹坑模式分类作为评估参考。
在A1评估中,计算得出的巴雷特食管特殊肠化生和发育异常的诊断敏感性因研究者而异,范围为54.9%至80.7%,A2评估的范围为42.2%至81.5%。评估程序A1和A2的观察者间和观察者内变异性都很高(所有kappa值<0.4)。特别是,与有经验的研究者相比,没有经验的研究者表现出较高的观察者内变异性和较低的敏感性。
乙酸灌注后使用增强放大内镜检查诊断巴雷特黏膜与观察者间的高变异性相关。一个原因是贲门黏膜与非发育异常的巴雷特黏膜之间经常不匹配。