Suppr超能文献

标准剂量与低剂量吉西他滨方案治疗胰腺腺癌患者的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。

Comparison of standard-dose and low-dose gemcitabine regimens in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients: a prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Sakamoto Hiroki, Kitano Masayuki, Suetomi Yoichirou, Takeyama Yoshifumi, Ohyanagi Harumasa, Nakai Takuya, Yasuda Chikao, Kudo Masatoshi

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University School of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, 589-8511, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;41(1):70-6. doi: 10.1007/s00535-005-1724-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A prospective, randomized study was performed to determine whether gemcitabine infusion at a low dose (250 mg/m2) is comparable or superior to the standard-dose infusion (1000 mg/m2) in terms of the survival period, clinical benefit, and frequency of adverse effects in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients who were histologically proven to have locally advanced pancreatic cancer or pancreatic cancer with distant metastases were initially enrolled in the present study. They were treated with gemcitabine infusion at either a dose of 1000 mg/m2 over 30 min (the standard regimen) on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 4-week cycle or at a dose of 250 mg/m2 over 30 min every week. Survival time, response rate, time to treatment failure, clinical benefit response, and adverse effects were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients received gemcitabine for more than 1 month. The median survival period was 7.2 months for patients who received the low-dose infusion regimen, in contrast to 5.2 months for patients administered the standard-dose infusion regimen. The time to treatment failure was 5.6 months for patients in the low-dose infusion regimen, in contrast to 3.4 months for patients in the standard-dose infusion regimen. There were no significant differences in either survival time to time to treatment failure or clinical benefits between the two groups, but the incidence of adverse reactions in patients administered the low-dose therapy was significantly lower than that in patients receiving the standard-dose therapy (P<0.05). In particular, patients in the standard infusion regimen group experienced more hematologic toxicity than those in the low-dose regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the low-dose gemcitabine infusion regimen can be continuously administered to patients with locally advanced and systemically spreading pancreatic cancer because of its reduced toxicity, resulting in better quality of life and an improved safety profile as compared to the standard infusion treatment regimen.

摘要

背景

开展了一项前瞻性随机研究,以确定在晚期胰腺腺癌患者的生存期、临床获益及不良反应发生频率方面,低剂量(250mg/m²)吉西他滨输注是否等同于或优于标准剂量输注(1000mg/m²)。

方法

本研究最初纳入25例经组织学证实为局部晚期胰腺癌或伴有远处转移的胰腺癌患者。他们接受吉西他滨输注治疗,每4周为一个周期,在第1、8和15天,以1000mg/m²的剂量在30分钟内输注(标准方案),或每周以250mg/m²的剂量在30分钟内输注。比较两组的生存时间、缓解率、治疗失败时间、临床获益反应及不良反应。

结果

21例患者接受吉西他滨治疗超过1个月。接受低剂量输注方案的患者中位生存期为7.2个月,而接受标准剂量输注方案的患者为5.2个月。低剂量输注方案患者的治疗失败时间为5.6个月,而标准剂量输注方案患者为3.4个月。两组在生存时间、治疗失败时间或临床获益方面均无显著差异,但低剂量治疗患者的不良反应发生率显著低于接受标准剂量治疗的患者(P<0.05)。特别是,标准输注方案组患者的血液学毒性比低剂量方案组更多。

结论

这些研究结果表明,低剂量吉西他滨输注方案可连续用于局部晚期和全身播散性胰腺癌患者,因为其毒性降低,与标准输注治疗方案相比,可带来更好的生活质量和更高的安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验