Hooker Claire, Chapman Simon
Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 3M7.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006 Feb;30(1):10-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2006.tb00078.x.
To analyse structural factors revealed by politicians that shaped legislation on tobacco control in New South Wales, 1955-95.
Parliamentary debates and other records were collected. Open-ended interviews were conducted with 17 Members of Parliament (MPs) who were significantly involved, and then analysed for structural elements.
Tobacco industry lobbying had a significant but limited influence on policy making, being exerted largely through social interactions with executives and based on concerns about the economic impact on third parties. MPs saw health advocates' chief functions as (1) generating community concern about the issue and support for control measures, and (2) bringing any new information to political attention, providing pro-control arguments and data through the media. Factors that delayed tobacco control policies included: the conservative stance of Premiers and major parties, commitments to unanimous federal action, and rivalry between parties. Factors that facilitated control policies included: reforms that gave the Legislative Council increased power, the use of parliamentary committees, and backbencher and grass roots support.
Tobacco control policy and legislation has been the product of political structures that gave power to those MPs in the least powerful positions--minor parties, Members of the Legislative Council (MLCs), backbenchers, women and party rank and file--rather than to major parties and their executives.
Advocates should make the most of their access points to the political process, providing information, arguments and support and demonstrating public opinion in favour of further control.
分析1955年至1995年期间政治家们所揭示的影响新南威尔士州烟草控制立法的结构因素。
收集议会辩论及其他记录。对17位深度参与其中的议员进行开放式访谈,然后分析其中的结构要素。
烟草行业游说对决策有显著但有限的影响,主要通过与企业高管的社会交往施加影响,且基于对第三方经济影响的担忧。议员们认为健康倡导者的主要作用是:(1)引起社区对该问题的关注并支持控制措施;(2)将任何新信息提请政治关注,通过媒体提供支持控制的论据和数据。延迟烟草控制政策的因素包括:州长和主要政党的保守立场、对联邦一致行动的承诺以及政党之间的竞争。促进控制政策的因素包括:赋予立法会议更多权力的改革、议会委员会的使用以及后座议员和基层的支持。
烟草控制政策和立法是政治结构的产物,赋予权力的是那些处于最无权地位的议员——小党派、立法会议员、后座议员、女性和普通党员,而非主要政党及其高管。
倡导者应充分利用其进入政治进程的途径,提供信息、论据和支持,并展示支持进一步控制的公众舆论。