Nadler Arie, Liviatan Ido
Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Apr;32(4):459-70. doi: 10.1177/0146167205276431.
The present study explores the effects of expressions of empathy for the ingroup's conflict-related suffering and assumed responsibility for causing it by a representative of the rival outgroup on recipient's willingness for reconciliation. It is suggested that such positive expressions by an adversary will have positive effects on reconciliation only in the presence of a basic level of trust in the outgroup. In two studies, Israeli-Jewish participants were exposed to a Palestinian leader who either expressed or did not express empathy and/or Palestinian responsibility for Israelis' suffering. After reading the speech, participants completed a questionnaire that measured their attitudes toward reconciliation with Palestinians. Results of both studies show that whereas expression of empathy led to more positive attitudes when trust was high, it tended to have adverse effects when trust was low. Similar effects were not found for assumed responsibility. Implications for research on intergroup conflict and reconciliation are discussed.
本研究探讨了敌对的外群体代表对本群体与冲突相关的苦难表达同理心以及对造成这种苦难承担责任,对接受者和解意愿的影响。研究表明,只有在外群体存在基本信任水平的情况下,对手的这种积极表达才会对和解产生积极影响。在两项研究中,以色列犹太参与者接触到一位巴勒斯坦领导人,该领导人要么表达了,要么没有表达对以色列人苦难的同理心和/或巴勒斯坦方面的责任。阅读演讲后,参与者完成了一份问卷,该问卷测量了他们对与巴勒斯坦人和解的态度。两项研究的结果都表明,当信任度高时,同理心的表达会导致更积极的态度,而当信任度低时,它往往会产生不利影响。对于承担责任则未发现类似影响。文中还讨论了对群体间冲突与和解研究的启示。