Steendijk Paul, Tulner Sven A, Bax Jeroen J, Oemrawsingh Pranobe V, Bleeker Gabe B, van Erven Lieselot, Putter Hein, Verwey Harriette F, van der Wall Ernst E, Schalij Martin J
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Circulation. 2006 Mar 14;113(10):1295-304. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.540435. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
Acute hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were reported previously, but detailed invasive studies showing hemodynamic consequences of long-term CRT are not available.
We studied 22 patients scheduled for implantation of a CRT device based on conventional criteria (New York Heart Association class III or IV, left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction <35%, left bundle-branch block, and QRS duration >120 ms). During diagnostic catheterization before CRT, we acquired pressure-volume loops using conductance catheters during atrial pacing at 80, 100, 120, and 140 bpm. Studies were repeated during biventricular pacing at the same heart rates after 6 months of CRT. Our data show a significant clinical benefit of CRT (New York Heart Association class change from 3.1+/-0.5 to 2.1+/-0.8; quality-of-life score change from 44+/-12 to 31+/-16; and 6-minute hall-walk distance increased from 260+/-149 to 396+/-129 m; all P<0.001), improved LV ejection fraction (from 29+/-10% to 40+/-13%, P<0.01), decreased end-diastolic pressure (from 18+/-8 to 13+/-6 mm Hg, P<0.05), and reverse remodeling (end-diastolic volume decreased from 257+/-67 to 205+/-54 mL, P<0.01). Previously reported acute improvements in LV function remained present at 6 months: dP/dtmax increased 18%, -dP/dtmin increased 13%, and stroke work increased 34% (all P<0.01). Effects of increased heart rate were improved toward more physiological responses for LV ejection fraction, cardiac output, and dP/dtmax. Moreover, our study showed improved ventricular-arterial coupling (69% increase, P<0.01) and improved mechanical efficiency (44% increase, P<0.01).
Hemodynamic improvements with CRT, previously shown in acute invasive studies, are maintained chronically. In addition, ventricular-arterial coupling, mechanical efficiency, and chronotropic responses are improved after 6 months of CRT. These findings may help to explain the improved functional status and exercise tolerance in patients treated with CRT.
先前已报道心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的急性血流动力学效应,但尚无详细的侵入性研究显示长期CRT的血流动力学后果。
我们研究了22例根据传统标准计划植入CRT装置的患者(纽约心脏协会III或IV级、左心室[LV]射血分数<35%、左束支传导阻滞且QRS时限>120毫秒)。在CRT植入前的诊断性心导管检查期间,我们在心房以80、100、120和140次/分钟起搏时使用电导导管获取压力-容积环。在CRT治疗6个月后,以相同心率进行双心室起搏时重复上述研究。我们的数据显示CRT具有显著的临床益处(纽约心脏协会分级从3.1±0.5变为2.1±0.8;生活质量评分从44±12变为31±16;6分钟步行距离从260±149米增加到396±129米;所有P<0.001),左心室射血分数提高(从29±10%提高到40±13%,P<0.01),舒张末期压力降低(从18±8降至13±6毫米汞柱,P<0.05),以及逆向重构(舒张末期容积从257±67毫升降至205±54毫升,P<0.01)。先前报道的左心室功能急性改善在6个月时仍然存在:dp/dtmax增加18%,-dp/dtmin增加13%,每搏功增加34%(所有P<0.01)。心率增加对左心室射血分数、心输出量和dp/dtmax的影响朝着更生理性的反应改善。此外,我们的研究显示心室-动脉耦合改善(增加69%,P<0.01)和机械效率提高(增加44%,P<0.01)。
CRT带来的血流动力学改善在急性侵入性研究中已有显示,且长期维持。此外,CRT治疗6个月后心室-动脉耦合、机械效率和变时反应得到改善。这些发现可能有助于解释接受CRT治疗患者的功能状态和运动耐量改善的原因。