Strauss B
Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Klinikum der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Stoystrasse 3, 07740 Jena.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2006 Apr;49(4):344-50. doi: 10.1007/s00103-006-1238-3.
Due to the amendment of the framework act for higher education in summer 2004, the German universities have to select 60% of the students within all disciplines with limited access (including medicine) by themselves. This requirement fits with the political intention to enhance the achievement of a specific profile and competition among the universities. The first implementation of the legal requirement has shown that the universities were insufficiently prepared to apply selection criteria amending high school grades. Theoretically, a variety of criteria could be considered whose suitability has to be evaluated carefully. Existing evidence related to these criteria is summarized in this article. The implementation of new tools for student selection will raise a variety of problems related to the quality of organisation, but also other aspects of quality assurance. It can be assumed that, in the long run, centrally developed tests will be applied within medicine that might be completed with other selection tools locally.
由于2004年夏季高等教育框架法案的修订,德国大学必须自行在所有入学受限学科(包括医学)中选拔60%的学生。这一要求符合提高大学特定形象和竞争力的政治意图。法律要求的首次实施表明,大学在应用修正高中成绩的选拔标准方面准备不足。理论上,可以考虑多种标准,其适用性必须仔细评估。本文总结了与这些标准相关的现有证据。实施新的学生选拔工具将引发与组织质量以及质量保证的其他方面相关的各种问题。可以设想,从长远来看,医学领域将应用中央统一开发的考试,可能还会辅以其他本地选拔工具。