Suppr超能文献

来访者的性取向和性别对边缘型人格障碍临床判断及诊断的影响。

The impact of client sexual orientation and gender on clinical judgments and diagnosis of borderline personality disorder.

作者信息

Eubanks-Carter Catherine, Goldfried Marvin R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;62(6):751-70. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20265.

Abstract

Concerns have been raised that individuals who are having difficulty coming out as gay or bisexual may be misdiagnosed with borderline personality disorder. In this analogue study, 141 psychologists evaluated a hypothetical client with problems that resembled borderline symptoms but were also consistent with a sexual identity crisis. Client descriptions varied by sexual orientation and gender. Results revealed an effect of sexual orientation for male clients, but not female clients. Male clients whom therapists perceived likely to be gay or bisexual, and male clients with partners of unspecified gender, were more likely to be diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. Therapists were more confident and willing to work with female clients and gave them a better prognosis. Therapists' responses are discussed in light of gender role bias and social desirability.

摘要

有人担心,那些难以公开自己同性恋或双性恋身份的人可能会被误诊为边缘型人格障碍。在这项模拟研究中,141名心理学家对一名假设的客户进行了评估,该客户存在类似边缘型症状但也符合性身份危机的问题。客户描述因性取向和性别而异。结果显示,男性客户存在性取向影响,但女性客户不存在。治疗师认为可能是同性恋或双性恋的男性客户,以及伴侣性别未明确的男性客户,更有可能被诊断为边缘型人格障碍。治疗师对女性客户更有信心且更愿意与其合作,并给予她们更好的预后。根据性别角色偏见和社会期望对治疗师的反应进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验