Suppr超能文献

多层黑血颈动脉壁成像:1.5T与3.0T对比

Multislice dark-blood carotid artery wall imaging: a 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison.

作者信息

Koktzoglou Ioannis, Chung Yiu-Cho, Mani Venkatesh, Carroll Timothy J, Morasch Mark D, Mizsei Gabor, Simonetti Orlando P, Fayad Zahi A, Li Debiao

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 May;23(5):699-705. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20563.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare two multislice turbo spin-echo (TSE) carotid artery wall imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, and to investigate the feasibility of higher spatial resolution carotid artery wall imaging at 3.0 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multislice proton density-weighted (PDW), T2-weighted (T2W), and T1-weighted (T1W) inflow/outflow saturation band (IOSB) and rapid extended coverage double inversion-recovery (REX-DIR) TSE carotid artery wall imaging was performed on six healthy volunteers at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using time-, coverage-, and spatial resolution-matched (0.47 x 0.47 x 3 mm3) imaging protocols. To investigate whether improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 3.0 T could allow for improved spatial resolution, higher spatial resolution imaging (0.31 x 0.31 x 3 mm3) was performed at 3.0 T. Carotid artery wall SNR, carotid lumen SNR, and wall-lumen contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured.

RESULTS

Signal gain at 3.0 T relative to 1.5 T was observed for carotid artery wall SNR (223%) and wall-lumen CNR (255%) in all acquisitions (P < 0.025). IOSB and REX-DIR images were found to have different levels of SNR and CNR (P < 0.05) with IOSB values observed to be larger. Normalized to a common imaging time, the higher spatial resolution imaging at 3.0 T and the lower spatial resolution imaging at 1.5 T provided similar levels of wall-lumen CNR (P = NS).

CONCLUSION

Multislice carotid wall imaging at 3.0 T with IOSB and REX-DIR benefits from improved SNR and CNR relative to 1.5 T, and allows for higher spatial resolution carotid artery wall imaging.

摘要

目的

比较1.5 T和3.0 T下的两种多层涡轮自旋回波(TSE)颈动脉壁成像技术,并研究在3.0 T下进行更高空间分辨率颈动脉壁成像的可行性。

材料与方法

对6名健康志愿者在1.5 T和3.0 T下使用时间、覆盖范围和空间分辨率匹配(0.47×0.47×3 mm3)的成像方案进行多层质子密度加权(PDW)、T2加权(T2W)以及T1加权(T1W)流入/流出饱和带(IOSB)和快速扩展覆盖双反转恢复(REX-DIR)TSE颈动脉壁成像。为研究3.0 T下改善的信噪比(SNR)是否能实现更高的空间分辨率,在3.0 T下进行了更高空间分辨率成像(0.31×0.31×3 mm3)。测量了颈动脉壁SNR、颈动脉腔SNR以及壁腔对比噪声比(CNR)。

结果

在所有采集图像中,相对于1.5 T,3.0 T下颈动脉壁SNR(223%)和壁腔CNR(255%)均观察到信号增益(P < 0.025)。发现IOSB和REX-DIR图像具有不同水平的SNR和CNR(P < 0.05),且观察到IOSB值更大。以相同成像时间进行归一化后,3.0 T下的更高空间分辨率成像和1.5 T下的较低空间分辨率成像提供了相似水平的壁腔CNR(P = 无显著性差异)。

结论

与1.5 T相比,采用IOSB和REX-DIR的3.0 T多层颈动脉壁成像受益于改善的SNR和CNR,并允许进行更高空间分辨率的颈动脉壁成像。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验