Kyle Fiona E, Harris Margaret
Centre for Neuroscience in Education, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2PQ, England.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2006 Summer;11(3):273-88. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enj037. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
Seven- and eight-year-old deaf children and hearing children of equivalent reading age were presented with a number of tasks designed to assess reading, spelling, productive vocabulary, speechreading, phonological awareness, short-term memory, and nonverbal intelligence. The two groups were compared for similarities and differences in the levels of performance and in the predictors of literacy. Multiple regressions showed that both productive vocabulary and speechreading were significant predictors of reading for the deaf children after hearing loss and nonverbal intelligence had been accounted for. However, spelling ability was not associated with any of the other measures apart from reading. For hearing children, age was the main determinant of reading and spelling ability (due to selection criterion). Possible explanations for the role of speechreading and productive vocabulary in deaf children's reading and the differences between the correlates of literacy for deaf and hearing children are discussed.
研究人员让7、8岁的失聪儿童以及阅读年龄相当的听力正常儿童完成了一系列任务,旨在评估他们的阅读、拼写、产出性词汇、唇读、语音意识、短期记忆和非言语智力。对两组儿童在表现水平和读写能力预测因素方面的异同进行了比较。多元回归分析表明,在考虑听力损失和非言语智力因素后,产出性词汇和唇读能力对失聪儿童的阅读具有显著的预测作用。然而,拼写能力除了与阅读相关外,与其他任何指标均无关联。对于听力正常的儿童,年龄是阅读和拼写能力的主要决定因素(由于选择标准)。文中讨论了唇读和产出性词汇在失聪儿童阅读中所起作用的可能解释,以及失聪儿童和听力正常儿童读写能力相关因素之间的差异。