Spooner Robert A, Smith Daniel C, Easton Andrew J, Roberts Lynne M, Lord J Michael
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Virol J. 2006 Apr 7;3:26. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-3-26.
A model has been presented for retrograde transport of certain toxins and viruses from the cell surface to the ER that suggests an obligatory interaction with a glycolipid receptor at the cell surface. Here we review studies on the ER trafficking cholera toxin, Shiga and Shiga-like toxins, Pseudomonas exotoxin A and ricin, and compare the retrograde routes followed by these protein toxins to those of the ER trafficking SV40 and polyoma viruses. We conclude that there is in fact no obligatory requirement for a glycolipid receptor, nor even with a protein receptor in a lipid-rich environment. Emerging data suggests instead that there is no common pathway utilised for retrograde transport by all of these pathogens, the choice of route being determined by the particular receptor utilised.
已经提出了一种模型,用于解释某些毒素和病毒从细胞表面到内质网的逆行运输,该模型表明其在细胞表面与糖脂受体存在必然的相互作用。在此,我们综述了关于内质网运输霍乱毒素、志贺毒素和志贺样毒素、铜绿假单胞菌外毒素A和蓖麻毒素的研究,并比较了这些蛋白质毒素与内质网运输SV40和多瘤病毒所采用的逆行途径。我们得出结论,实际上并不必然需要糖脂受体,甚至在富含脂质的环境中也不一定需要蛋白质受体。相反,新出现的数据表明,所有这些病原体并非利用共同的途径进行逆行运输,运输途径的选择取决于所利用的特定受体。