Servat A, Cliquet F
AFSSA Nancy, Laboratoire d'Etudes et de Recherches sur la Rage et la Pathologie des Animaux Sauvages, Domaine de Pixérécourt, B.P. no 9, 54220 Malzéville, France.
Virus Res. 2006 Sep;120(1-2):17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.02.011. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
To prevent any introduction of rabies, many rabies-free countries have adopted a scheme requiring the rabies vaccination of pets associated with a serological test. FAVN test and RFFIT are the current OIE prescribed techniques to perform this assay. A qualitative indirect ELISA (Serelisa) test has been recently described as a screening test to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccination of pets. A lack of sensitivity requires ELISA negative samples to be retested using an OIE confirmatory test. This raised the question whether this new test could be reasonably proposed as an alternative tool in the context of international trades of pets. The Community Reference Institute of Nancy organized a short trial to answer this question. In this study, 16 laboratories tested a panel of their own samples with FAVN test/RFFIT and the Serelisa. The comparison of results revealed that the performance of the Serelisa is highly heterogeneous. A lack of sensitivity was detected in 50% of participants, when 25% of laboratories obtained a significant rate of false positive results. This last point questions the pertinence of using the Serelisa in the context of international trades by preventing any movements of insufficiently or non-protected animals.
为防止狂犬病传入,许多无狂犬病国家采用了一项计划,要求对宠物进行狂犬病疫苗接种并进行血清学检测。FAVN试验和RFFIT是目前国际兽疫局规定的用于此项检测的技术。最近有一种定性间接ELISA(Serelisa)试验被描述为一种筛查试验,用于监测宠物狂犬病疫苗接种的效果。由于缺乏敏感性,ELISA阴性样本需要使用国际兽疫局的确认试验进行重新检测。这就提出了一个问题,即在宠物国际贸易背景下,这种新试验是否可以合理地作为一种替代工具。南锡社区参考研究所组织了一项简短试验来回答这个问题。在本研究中,16个实验室用FAVN试验/RFFIT和Serelisa检测了一组他们自己的样本。结果比较显示,Serelisa的性能高度异质。50%的参与者检测到缺乏敏感性,25%的实验室获得了显著的假阳性结果率。最后这一点对在国际贸易中使用Serelisa的相关性提出了质疑,因为它会阻止未充分保护或未受保护的动物的任何流动。