Morton R Hugh
Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, PBag 11-222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
J Sports Sci. 2006 May;24(5):495-9. doi: 10.1080/02640410500189074.
This study evaluates home advantages both for national (Super 12) and international (Tri-nations) rugby union teams from South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, over the five-year period 2000 - 2004 using linear modelling. These home advantages are examined for statistical and practical significance, for variability between teams, for stability over time and for inter-correlation. These data reveal that the overall home advantage in elite rugby union has a mean of +6.7 points, and that this changes little from year to year. Closer scrutiny nevertheless reveals a high degree of variability. Different teams can and do have different home advantages, which ranges from a low of -0.7 to a high of +28.3 points in any one year. Furthermore, some team home advantages change up or down from one year to the next, by as much as -36.5 to +31.4 points at the extremes. There is no evidence that the stronger teams have the higher home advantages, or that a high home advantage leads to a superior finishing position in the competition.
本研究采用线性模型评估了2000年至2004年这五年间,南非、澳大利亚和新西兰的国家(超级12联赛)和国际(三国赛)橄榄球联盟球队的主场优势。对这些主场优势进行了统计和实际意义、球队间变异性、随时间的稳定性以及相互关联性的检验。这些数据显示,精英橄榄球联盟的总体主场优势平均为+6.7分,且逐年变化不大。然而,仔细审查会发现存在高度变异性。不同球队的主场优势不同,且确实存在差异,在任何一年中,主场优势范围从低至-0.7分到高至+28.3分。此外,一些球队的主场优势在不同年份会上下变化,极端情况下变化幅度高达-36.5分至+31.4分。没有证据表明强队拥有更高的主场优势,或者高主场优势会导致在比赛中获得更好的排名。