Suppr超能文献

儿童对日常推理的信念。

Children's beliefs about everyday reasoning.

作者信息

Amsterlaw Jennifer

机构信息

Institute for learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2006 Mar-Apr;77(2):443-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00881.x.

Abstract

Two studies investigated children's metacognition about everyday reasoning, assessing how they distinguish reasoning from nonreasoning and "good" reasoning from "bad." In Study 1, 80 1st graders (6-7 years), 3rd graders (8-9 years), 5th graders (10-11 years), and adults (18+ years) evaluated scenarios where people (a) used reasoning, (b) solved problems with nonreasoning approaches, or (c) reacted appropriately but automatically to events. All age groups distinguished reasoning from type (b) nonreasoning cases, but age-related improvement occurred for type (c) cases. Study 2 tested 160 1st, 3rd, 5th graders' and adults' evaluation of good and bad reasoning processes, finding 2 developmental changes: initial improvement in discriminating thinking processes by 3rd grade, and emergence of an adult-like, process-focused (vs. outcome-focused) concept of thinking quality by 5th grade.

摘要

两项研究调查了儿童对日常推理的元认知,评估他们如何区分推理与非推理,以及“好”推理与“坏”推理。在研究1中,80名一年级学生(6 - 7岁)、三年级学生(8 - 9岁)、五年级学生(10 - 11岁)和成年人(18岁以上)对一些情景进行了评估,在这些情景中人们(a)运用推理,(b)用非推理方法解决问题,或(c)对事件做出适当但自动的反应。所有年龄组都能区分推理与(b)类非推理情况,但对于(c)类情况出现了与年龄相关的进步。研究2测试了160名一年级、三年级、五年级学生和成年人对好的和坏的推理过程的评估,发现了两个发展变化:到三年级时在区分思维过程方面初步有所进步,到五年级时出现了类似成年人的、以过程为重点(而非以结果为重点)的思维质量概念。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验