Elliott Elizabeth A, Wright James R, Swann R Suzanne, Nguyen-Tân Felix, Takita Cristiane, Bucci M Kara, Garden Adam S, Kim Harold, Hug Eugen B, Ryu Janice, Greenberg Michael, Saxton Jerrold P, Ang Kian, Berk Lawrence
Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1;24(13):2092-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.9148.
This multicentered phase III trial was designed to compare an emulsion containing trolamine against the usual supportive care within each participating institution for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy.
Patients with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: prophylactic trolamine emulsion, interventional trolamine emulsion, or declared institutional preference. The primary outcome was the reduction in grade 2 or higher skin toxicity, as per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported quality of life (QOL).
From October 2000 to April 2002, 547 patients from 51 institutions were entered onto the trial. The average age was 59 years. Patients were predominately male (79%) and most continued to use tobacco products (52%). The rates of grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis were 79%, 77%, and 79% in the prophylactic, interventional, and institutional preference arms of the study, respectively. No significant differences in QOL were found.
The results of this trial demonstrate no advantage for the use of trolamine in reducing the incidence of grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis or improving patient-reported QOL. The use of 15 different local standards of care highlights the need to continue research that will result in evidence-based recommendations to reduce the burden of radiation dermatitis.
本多中心III期试验旨在比较含托拉明的乳剂与各参与机构中接受放射治疗的头颈癌患者的常规支持治疗。
经活检证实患有口腔、口咽、下咽或喉鳞状细胞癌的患者被随机分配至以下治疗组之一:预防性托拉明乳剂、介入性托拉明乳剂或声明的机构偏好治疗。主要结局是根据美国国立癌症研究所通用毒性标准第2.0版,2级或更高等级皮肤毒性的降低情况。次要结局包括患者报告的生活质量(QOL)。
从2000年10月至2002年4月,来自51个机构的547名患者进入试验。平均年龄为59岁。患者以男性为主(79%),大多数继续使用烟草制品(52%)。在研究的预防性、介入性和机构偏好治疗组中,2级或更高等级放射性皮炎的发生率分别为79%、77%和79%。未发现生活质量有显著差异。
本试验结果表明,使用托拉明在降低2级或更高等级放射性皮炎的发生率或改善患者报告的生活质量方面没有优势。采用15种不同的当地护理标准凸显了继续开展研究的必要性,以便得出基于证据的建议,减轻放射性皮炎的负担。