El Menyar Ayman A, Altamimi O M, Gomaa Mohamed M, Fawzy Zainab, Rahman M O Abdel, Bener Abdulbari
Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, State of Qatar.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2006 Jun;21(3):235-40. doi: 10.1007/s11239-006-5484-x.
The resistance to thrombolytic agents and delays in reperfusion occur in more than 30% after acute myocardial infarction. This may play an important role in the unsuccessful recanalization after thrombolytic therapy. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical and biochemical markers of reperfusion after different types of thrombolytic therapy and to find out the relationship between PAI-1 and ACE serum levels and the short-term outcome. Pretreatment ACE and PAI-1 plasma levels of 184 patients with acute myocardial infarction, treated with thrombolytic therapy were determined. Failure of thrombolysis was considered when reperfusion was delayed as assessed by noninvasive reperfusion criteria, reinfarction, and impaired left ventricular function. High plasma level of ACE (> 50 U/L), PAI-1 (> 43 ng/ml) and both was found in 57, 108 and 32 patients respectively. Subjects with high ACE plasma levels were characterized by impaired LV systolic function (79.0% vs. 75.0%), new Q-wave (88.4% vs. 74.2%), less reperfusion arrhythmia (19.3% vs. 22.8%) and prolonged hospitalization (70% vs. 66%) but no statistical significance was observed. High enzymes levels of PAI-1 were observed with higher incidence of anterior myocardial infarction (50.0% vs. 41.0%), lesser ST segment resolution (65.6% vs. 58.8%), reinfarction (6.3% vs. 5.9%), and impaired LV systolic function (90.6% vs. 76.0%), and prolonged hospitalization (70.4% vs. 63.4). There was a statistically significant difference between thrombolytic agents in the presence of high ACE regarding hospital overstay (p = 0.02). While the presence of high PAI-1 was significantly affect the degree of ST-segment resolution (p = 0.03).
High plasma ACE and/or PAI-1 plays a considerable role in the higher incidence of unsuccessful reperfusion and impaired left ventricular function after thrombolytic therapy. A rapid diagnostic tool that enables physician of detecting those enzymes before giving thrombolytic therapy may change the strategy of treatment to offer another effective revascularization method.
急性心肌梗死后,超过30%的患者会出现对溶栓药物的抵抗以及再灌注延迟。这可能在溶栓治疗后再通失败中起重要作用。本研究的目的是评估不同类型溶栓治疗后再灌注的临床和生化标志物,并找出纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1(PAI-1)和血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)血清水平与短期预后之间的关系。测定了184例接受溶栓治疗的急性心肌梗死患者治疗前的ACE和PAI-1血浆水平。当根据无创再灌注标准评估再灌注延迟、再梗死和左心室功能受损时,认为溶栓失败。分别在57例、108例和32例患者中发现血浆ACE水平高(>50 U/L)、PAI-1水平高(>43 ng/ml)以及两者均高。血浆ACE水平高的患者具有左心室收缩功能受损(79.0%对75.0%)、新Q波(88.4%对74.2%)、再灌注心律失常较少(19.3%对22.8%)和住院时间延长(70%对66%)的特点,但未观察到统计学意义。观察到PAI-1酶水平高时,前壁心肌梗死的发生率较高(50.0%对41.0%)、ST段分辨率较低(65.6%对58.8%)、再梗死(6.3%对5.9%)以及左心室收缩功能受损(90.6%对76.0%),且住院时间延长(70.4%对63.4%)。在高ACE存在的情况下,不同溶栓药物在住院时间方面存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.02)。而高PAI-1的存在显著影响ST段分辨率(p = 0.03)。
血浆ACE和/或PAI-1水平高在溶栓治疗后再灌注失败和左心室功能受损的较高发生率中起相当大的作用。一种能够使医生在给予溶栓治疗前检测这些酶的快速诊断工具可能会改变治疗策略,以提供另一种有效的血管再通方法。