Dursun A B, Sin B A, Oner F, Misirligil Z
Ankara University, School of Medicine, Department of Allergic Diseases, Ankara, Turkey.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006;16(2):123-8.
Allergen immunotherapy (IT) has encouraging therapeutic outcomes but its safety is still being questioned because of possible severe systemic reactions. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of systemic reactions (SR), and to identify their correlation with the characteristics of therapy, such as allergen composition and IT schedule, and diagnosis. We analyzed the data of 126 patients who received IT between 2000-2003, and suffered from respiratory allergy or hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis. IT was given by rush, clustered or conventional schedules. The standardized allergen extracts used were grass pollen, house dust mite and hymenoptera venom in 88, 18 and 20 patients, respectively. None of the patients received premedication. A total 4705 injections were administered. One hundred and twenty-three adverse events (AE) (2.6% per injection) were documented in 46 patients. Sixty-one of them were SRs (1.3% SRs per injection) and they were seen in 28 patients. Asthmatics had more tendency to SRs (p=0.05). Rush (1.8%) and clustered (2.8%) IT protocols were associated with a higher rate of SRs (per injection) when compared to conventional schedule (0.9%) (rush vs conventional; p=0.013, clustered vs conventional; p=0.001). The majority of SRs corresponded to grade 3 (49%). Forty-nine (80%) of the 61 SRs were observed during the build-up phase, and mostly with pollen extracts (75.5%). Patients showed more severe SRs during the build-up phase (p<0.05). Twenty-six (42.6%) of the SRs were immediate, whereas 35 (57.4%) SRs appeared within 2 hours. Delayed SRs were significantly more frequent in polysensitized patients when compared to monosensitized subjects (p=0.018). Our data indicate that rapid IT regimens and the presence of asthma represent a greater risk for SR development. Since the late SRs occur as frequently as the early ones, we suggest a longer waiting period beyond 30 minutes, especially in polysensitized and asthmatic patients.
变应原免疫疗法(IT)具有令人鼓舞的治疗效果,但其安全性仍因可能出现的严重全身反应而受到质疑。本研究的目的是确定全身反应(SR)的发生率,并确定其与治疗特征(如变应原成分、IT方案和诊断)之间的相关性。我们分析了2000年至2003年间接受IT治疗且患有呼吸道过敏或膜翅目毒液过敏反应的126例患者的数据。IT采用快速、集中或常规方案给药。分别有88例、18例和20例患者使用标准化变应原提取物,包括草花粉、屋尘螨和膜翅目毒液。所有患者均未接受预处理。共注射4705次。46例患者记录到123次不良事件(AE)(每次注射发生率为2.6%)。其中61次为SR(每次注射SR发生率为1.3%),28例患者出现SR。哮喘患者发生SR的倾向更高(p=0.05)。与常规方案(0.9%)相比,快速(1.8%)和集中(2.8%)IT方案的SR发生率(每次注射)更高(快速与常规;p=0.013,集中与常规;p=0.001)。大多数SR为3级(49%)。61次SR中的49次(80%)在剂量递增阶段观察到,且大多与花粉提取物有关(75.5%)。患者在剂量递增阶段出现的SR更严重(p<0.05)。26次(42.6%)SR为速发反应,而35次(57.4%)SR在2小时内出现。与单敏患者相比,多敏患者迟发SR的发生率显著更高(p=0.018)。我们的数据表明,快速IT方案和哮喘的存在是SR发生的更大风险因素。由于迟发SR与早发SR的发生率相当,我们建议延长30分钟后的观察期,尤其是多敏和哮喘患者。