Conus Philippe, Cotton Sue, Abdel-Baki Amal, Lambert Martin, Berk Michael, McGorry Patrick D
Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie CHUV, Université de Lausanne, Prilly, Switzerland.
Bipolar Disord. 2006 Jun;8(3):221-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00315.x.
Recent studies have shown that outcome in mania is worse than previously thought. Such studies have been conducted in selected samples with restrictive measures of outcome. We aimed to explore outcome and its predictors in a catchment area sample of first-episode psychotic mania of DSM-III-R bipolar I disorder.
Prospective 6 and 12 months follow-up was conducted with 87 DSM-III-R first-episode psychotic mania patients admitted to Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre between 1989 and 1997. Syndromic and symptomatic outcome were determined with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; functional outcome with the Quality of Life Scale and Premorbid Adjustment Scale subitems.
Symptomatic outcome was assessed in 67 patients at 6 months and 61 patients at 12 months, and functional outcome in 56 patients at 6 months and 49 patients at 12 months. Logistic regressions were conducted on 46 and 43 patients, respectively, to explore predictors of outcome. While 90% of patients achieved syndromic recovery at 6 and 12 months, 40% had not recovered symptomatically at 6 and 12 months, still presenting with anxiety or depression. A total of 66% of patients at 6 months and 61% of patients at 12 months failed to return to previous level of functioning. Age at intake, family history of affective disorder, illicit drug use and functional recovery at 6 months predicted functional outcome at 12 months.
This study confirms poor symptomatic and functional outcome after first-episode psychotic mania. It suggests possible usefulness of early intervention strategies in bipolar disorders and need for developing specific interventions addressing anxiety, depression and substance abuse comorbidity.
近期研究表明,躁狂症的预后比之前认为的更差。此类研究是在对预后有严格衡量标准的特定样本中开展的。我们旨在探讨《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》(DSM-III-R)中I型双相情感障碍首次发作精神病性躁狂症患者在一个集水区样本中的预后情况及其预测因素。
对1989年至1997年间入住早期精神病预防与干预中心的87例DSM-III-R首次发作精神病性躁狂症患者进行了为期6个月和12个月的前瞻性随访。使用简明精神病评定量表确定综合征及症状性预后;使用生活质量量表和病前适应量表子项目确定功能预后。
67例患者在6个月时接受了症状性预后评估,61例患者在12个月时接受了评估;56例患者在6个月时接受了功能预后评估,49例患者在12个月时接受了评估。分别对46例和43例患者进行了逻辑回归分析,以探讨预后的预测因素。虽然90%的患者在6个月和12个月时实现了综合征康复,但40%的患者在6个月和12个月时症状未恢复,仍存在焦虑或抑郁症状。6个月时共有66%的患者以及12个月时61%的患者未能恢复到之前的功能水平。入院时的年龄、情感障碍家族史、非法药物使用情况以及6个月时的功能恢复情况可预测12个月时的功能预后。
本研究证实首次发作精神病性躁狂症后症状性和功能性预后较差。这表明早期干预策略在双相情感障碍中可能有用,且需要制定针对焦虑、抑郁和物质滥用共病的特定干预措施。