Luria Roy, Meiran Nachshon
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Apr;59(4):720-44. doi: 10.1080/02724980543000060.
A change in subtask order in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm increases the effect of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) on the second response. We used a paradigm with cued, randomly determined subtask order to test the hypothesis that this SOA by order switch overadditivity reflects order control, via "copying" stimulus order. In Experiments 1a and 1b, overadditivity was evident only with insufficient opportunity for cue-based order control. In Experiment 2, overadditivity was decreased by using the same set of stimuli in the two subtasks, presumably by removing the opportunity to rely on stimulus order. In Experiment 3, removing the order cue increased the overadditivity, presumably because control was based solely upon copying stimulus order. The results indicate interactive top-down and bottom-up order control. Implications to theories of the PRP paradigm are discussed.
心理不应期(PRP)范式中,子任务顺序的改变会增强刺激起始异步性(SOA)对第二个反应的影响。我们采用一种带有提示的、随机确定子任务顺序的范式,来检验这样一个假设:这种由顺序切换导致的SOA超可加性反映了通过“复制”刺激顺序实现的顺序控制。在实验1a和1b中,只有在基于提示的顺序控制机会不足时,超可加性才明显。在实验2中,通过在两个子任务中使用同一组刺激,超可加性降低了,推测是因为消除了依赖刺激顺序的机会。在实验3中,去除顺序提示增加了超可加性,推测是因为控制完全基于复制刺激顺序。结果表明存在自上而下和自下而上的交互顺序控制。并讨论了对PRP范式理论的启示。