Suppr超能文献

使用光学测量方法分析不同类型牙胶尖的收缩情况。

Analysis of shrinkage of different gutta-percha types using optical measurement methods.

作者信息

Meyer Katharina M, Kollmar Fritz, Schirrmeister Jörg F, Schneider Frank, Hellwig Elmar

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2006;116(4):356-61.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the shrinkage of alpha- and beta-gutta-percha of the Multifill-system with commercial gutta-percha. Ten gutta-percha blocks of each of the three types were used. Speckle pattern shearing interferometry was used to prove that no trapped air and material defects were present in the specimens. The optical triangulation method was applied to assess shrinkage. The three gutta-percha types were examined after heating up to 90 degrees C and cooling down to 35 degrees C. Commercial gutta-percha showed less shrinkage (6.5%) than alpha- (7.2%) and beta-gutta-percha (7.3%; p=0.0051 for both comparisons; Wilcoxon's signed rank test). There was a significant difference between alpha- and beta-gutta-percha (p=0.0093; Wilcoxon's signed rank test). In the range of 45 degrees C to 40 degrees C, alpha- and beta-gutta-percha revealed the highest shrinkage (2.2%/5 degrees C and 2.1%/5 degrees C, respectively). Commercial gutta-percha showed the highest shrinkage (1.1%/5 degrees C) in the range of 55 degrees C to 40 degrees C. Overall, shrinkage of all types of gutta-percha was higher than could be assumed from former studies.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较Multifill系统的α型和β型牙胶与市售牙胶的收缩率。每种类型使用10个牙胶块。采用散斑剪切干涉测量法证明样本中不存在 trapped air 和材料缺陷。应用光学三角测量法评估收缩率。将三种牙胶类型加热至90摄氏度并冷却至35摄氏度后进行检查。市售牙胶的收缩率(6.5%)低于α型牙胶(7.2%)和β型牙胶(7.3%);两种比较的p值均为0.0051;采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验。α型和β型牙胶之间存在显著差异(p = 0.0093;Wilcoxon符号秩检验)。在45摄氏度至40摄氏度范围内,α型和β型牙胶的收缩率最高(分别为2.2%/5摄氏度和2.1%/5摄氏度)。市售牙胶在55摄氏度至40摄氏度范围内收缩率最高(1.1%/5摄氏度)。总体而言,所有类型牙胶的收缩率均高于以往研究的预期。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验