Brassard Patrice, Ferland Annie, Gaudreault Valérie, Bonneville Nadine, Jobin Jean, Poirier Paul
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie, Centre de Recherche l'Hôpital Laval, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada G1V 4G5.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Sep;101(3):893-7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00260.2006. Epub 2006 May 25.
Subjects with Type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular disease have a reduced exercise capacity compared with nondiabetic subjects. However, the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon are unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of exercise systolic blood pressure (SBP) response on diverse exercise tolerance parameters in Type 2 diabetic subjects. Twenty-eight sedentary men with Type 2 diabetes were recruited for this study. Subjects were treated with oral hypoglycemic agents and/or diet. Evaluation of glycemic control and peak exercise capacity were performed for each subject. The subjects were divided into two groups according to the median value of peak SBP (210 mmHg) measured in each subject. We observed a 13, 13, and 16% reduction in the relative peak oxygen uptake (V(O2 peak)), absolute V(O2 peak), and peak work rate in the low- compared with the high-peak SBP group [26.95 (SD 5.35) vs. 30.96 (SD 3.61) ml.kg(-1).min(-1), 2.5 (SD 0.4) vs. 2.8 (SD 0.6) l/min, and 169 (SD 34) vs. 202 (SD 32) W; all P < 0.05]. After adjusting for age, relative V(O2 peak) was still significantly different (P < 0.05). There were similar peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER) [1.20 (SD 0.08) vs. 1.16 (SD 0.07); P = 0.24] and peak heart rate [160 (SD 20) vs. 169 (SD 15) beats/min; P = 0.18] between the low- compared with the high-SBP group. No difference in glycemic control was observed between the two groups. The results reported in this study suggest that in subjects with Type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular disease, an elevated exercise SBP is not associated with reduced exercise capacity and its modulation is probably not related to glycemic control.
与非糖尿病受试者相比,患有2型糖尿病且无心血管疾病的受试者运动能力降低。然而,导致这种现象的机制尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估运动收缩压(SBP)反应对2型糖尿病受试者各种运动耐力参数的影响。本研究招募了28名久坐不动的2型糖尿病男性。受试者接受口服降糖药和/或饮食治疗。对每个受试者进行血糖控制和峰值运动能力评估。根据每个受试者测量的峰值SBP中位数(210 mmHg)将受试者分为两组。我们观察到,与高SBP组相比,低SBP组的相对峰值摄氧量(V(O2峰值))、绝对V(O2峰值)和峰值工作率分别降低了13%、13%和16%[26.95(标准差5.35)对30.96(标准差3.61)ml·kg(-1)·min(-1),2.5(标准差0.4)对2.8(标准差0.6)l/min,以及169(标准差34)对202(标准差32)W;所有P<0.05]。在调整年龄后,相对V(O2峰值)仍有显著差异(P<0.05)。低SBP组与高SBP组之间的峰值呼吸交换率(RER)[1.20(标准差0.08)对1.16(标准差0.07);P = 0.24]和峰值心率[160(标准差20)对169(标准差15)次/分钟;P = 0.18]相似。两组之间未观察到血糖控制差异。本研究报告的结果表明,在患有2型糖尿病且无心血管疾病的受试者中,运动SBP升高与运动能力降低无关,其调节可能与血糖控制无关。