Wilde Heather, Magnuson Curt, Shea Charles H
Health Science Center, University of Texas, USA.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005 Dec;76(4):416-25. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599314.
Three similar six-element key press sequences were practiced under blocked or random practice schedules with acquisition conducted on one day and retention and transfer on the next day. The task required participants to type, as quickly as possible, one of three 6-element sequences as observed on a computer monitor. In blocked practice, participants completed all practice in one repeated sequence before the next repeated sequence was introduced. In random acquisition practice, the three repeated sequences were randomly presented to the participants. The data suggest that random practice results in participants adopting a uniform response structure, while blocked practice allows participants to exploit unique sequential aspects of the individual tasks. This finding suggests that random practice may not be as effective as blocked practice when one of the tasks being practiced together can be optimized through the development of a unique response structure.
在集中练习或随机练习的安排下,对三个相似的六元素按键序列进行了练习,练习在一天内进行,第二天进行保持和迁移测试。任务要求参与者尽快打出在电脑屏幕上看到的三个六元素序列中的一个。在集中练习中,参与者在引入下一个重复序列之前,先按一个重复序列完成所有练习。在随机练习中,这三个重复序列被随机呈现给参与者。数据表明,随机练习会使参与者采用统一的反应结构,而集中练习则允许参与者利用各个任务独特的顺序特征。这一发现表明,当一起练习的任务之一可以通过发展独特的反应结构来优化时,随机练习可能不如集中练习有效。