Nilsen P
Department of Health and Society, Division of Social Medicine and Public Health Science, Linköping University, SE-58183 Linköping, Sweden.
Inj Prev. 2006 Jun;12(3):140-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.011239.
This paper examines the theoretical underpinning of the community based approach to health and safety programs. Drawing upon the literature, a theory is constructed by elucidating assumptions of community based programs. The theory is then put to test by analyzing the extent to which the assumptions are supported by empirical evidence and the extent to which the assumptions have been applied in community based injury prevention practice. Seven principles representing key assumptions of the community based approach to health and safety programs are identified. The analysis suggests that some of the principles may have important shortcomings. Programs overwhelmingly define geographical or geopolitical units as communities, which is problematic considering that these entities can be heterogeneous and characterized by a weak sense of community. This may yield insufficient community mobilization and inadequate program reach. At the same time, none of the principles identified as most plausible appears to be widely or fully applied in program practice. The implication is that many community based health and safety programs do not function at an optimum level, which could explain some of the difficulties in demonstrating effectiveness seen with many of these programs.
本文探讨了基于社区的健康与安全计划方法的理论基础。借鉴相关文献,通过阐明基于社区的计划的假设构建了一种理论。然后,通过分析这些假设在多大程度上得到实证证据的支持以及在基于社区的伤害预防实践中应用的程度来对该理论进行检验。确定了代表基于社区的健康与安全计划方法关键假设的七条原则。分析表明,其中一些原则可能存在重大缺陷。这些计划绝大多数将地理或地缘政治单位定义为社区,鉴于这些实体可能具有异质性且社区意识淡薄,这是有问题的。这可能导致社区动员不足和计划覆盖范围不够。与此同时,被认为最合理的原则在计划实践中似乎都没有得到广泛或充分的应用。这意味着许多基于社区的健康与安全计划并未达到最佳运行水平,这可以解释这些计划中许多在证明有效性方面所遇到的一些困难。