Grantham-McGregor S M, Powell C A, Walker S P, Himes J H
Tropical Metabolism Research Unit, University of the West Indies, Jamaica.
Lancet. 1991 Jul 6;338(8758):1-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90001-6.
There is little unequivocal evidence that nutritional supplementation of undernourished children has a beneficial effect on their mental development. The effects of nutritional supplementation, with or without psychosocial stimulation, of growth-retarded (stunted) children aged 9-24 months were assessed in a study in Kingston, Jamaica. 129 children from poor neighbourhoods were randomly assigned to four groups--control, supplemented only, stimulated only, and supplemented plus stimulated. A group of matched non-stunted children (n = 32) was also included. The supplement comprised 1 kg milk-based formula per week for 2 years, and the stimulation weekly play sessions at home with a community health aide. The children's development (DQ) was assessed on the Griffiths mental development scales. Initially the stunted groups' DQs were lower than those of the non-stunted group, and those of the control group declined during the study, increasing their deficit. Stimulation and supplementation had significant independent beneficial effects on the children's development. Estimates of the supplementation effect ranged from 2.2 (95% confidence limits-1.4, 5.7) for the hand and eye subscale to 12.4 (5.4, 19.5) for the locomotor subscale and those for the stimulation effect from 6.4 (2.8, 10.0) for hand and eye to 10.3 (3.3, 17.3) for locomotor. The treatment effects were additive, and combined interventions were significantly more effective than either alone. These findings suggest that poor mental development in stunted children is at least partly attributable to undernutrition.
几乎没有明确的证据表明,对营养不良的儿童进行营养补充对其智力发育有有益影响。在牙买加金斯敦进行的一项研究中,评估了营养补充(无论有无心理社会刺激)对9至24个月生长发育迟缓(发育不良)儿童的影响。来自贫困社区的129名儿童被随机分为四组——对照组、仅补充营养组、仅接受刺激组以及补充营养加接受刺激组。还纳入了一组匹配的发育正常儿童(n = 32)。补充剂为每周1千克以牛奶为基础的配方奶粉,持续两年,刺激措施为每周由社区健康助手在家中组织游戏活动。使用格里菲斯智力发育量表对儿童的发育情况(发育商数)进行评估。最初,发育迟缓组的发育商数低于发育正常组,且对照组的发育商数在研究期间下降,差距进一步扩大。刺激和补充营养对儿童发育有显著的独立有益影响。补充营养的效果估计值,手部和眼部子量表为2.2(95%置信区间 -1.4, 5.7),运动子量表为12.4(5.4, 19.5);刺激的效果估计值,手部和眼部为6.4(2.8, 10.0),运动为10.3(3.3, 17.3)。治疗效果具有叠加性,联合干预比单独干预显著更有效。这些发现表明,发育迟缓儿童智力发育不良至少部分归因于营养不良。