Russel Steven, Gilson Lucy
University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(7):1732-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.017.
Investing in pro-poor health services is central to poverty reduction and achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. As health care financing mechanisms have an important influence over access and treatment costs they are central to the debates over health systems and their impact on poverty. This paper examines people's utilisation of health care services and illness cost burdens in a setting of free public provision, Sri Lanka. It assesses whether and how free health care protected poor and vulnerable households from illness costs and illness-induced impoverishment, using data from a cross-sectional survey (423 households) and longitudinal case study household research (16 households). The findings inform policy debates about how to improve protection levels, including the contribution of free health care services to poverty reduction. Assessment of policy options that can improve health system performance must start from a better understanding of the demand-side influences over performance.
投资于扶贫卫生服务对于减贫和实现千年发展目标至关重要。由于医疗保健筹资机制对医疗服务可及性和治疗成本有重要影响,因此它们是关于卫生系统及其对贫困影响的辩论的核心。本文考察了在斯里兰卡免费公共医疗服务背景下人们对医疗服务的利用情况以及疾病成本负担。它利用一项横断面调查(423户家庭)和纵向案例研究家庭调查(16户家庭)的数据,评估免费医疗服务是否以及如何保护贫困和脆弱家庭免受疾病成本和疾病导致的贫困影响。研究结果为有关如何提高保障水平的政策辩论提供了参考,包括免费医疗服务对减贫的贡献。对能够改善卫生系统绩效的政策选项进行评估,必须从更好地理解需求方对绩效的影响开始。