Tung Roderick H, Camargo Carlos A, Krauser Dan, Anwaruddin Saif, Baggish Aaron, Chen Annabel, Januzzi James L
Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;48(1):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.022. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
We evaluate results from amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) testing with or without those of clinical judgment for the evaluation of dyspneic patients with previous chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma.
As a secondary analysis of previously collected observational data from a convenience sample of 599 breathless patients, 216 patients with previous chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma who presented to the emergency department were analyzed according to results of NT-proBNP, clinical impression, and their final diagnosis. Test performance of NT-proBNP in these patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma was examined for the group as a whole, as well as in patients with and without previous heart failure. NT-proBNP results were compared to clinician-estimated likelihood for heart failure using receiver operating curves and as a function of NT-proBNP plus clinical evaluation. The final diagnosis was determined by 2 independent cardiologists blinded to NT-proBNP using all available data from the 60-day follow-up period.
Overall, 55 patients (25%) had acute heart failure; the median value of NT-proBNP was higher in these patients compared with those without acute heart failure (2,238 vs 178 pg/mL); use of cut points of 450 pg/mL for patients younger than 50 years and 900 pg/mL for patients 50 years or older yielded a sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72% to 93%) and a specificity of 84% (95% CI 76% to 88%). In patients without previous heart failure (n=164), median NT-proBNP levels were also higher in patients with heart failure of new onset compared with those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma exacerbation (1561 versus 168 pg/mL). High clinical suspicion for acute heart failure (probability >80%) detected only 23% of patients with new-onset heart failure, whereas 82% of these patients had elevated NT-proBNP levels. In patients who had both previous acute heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma (n=52), median NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in those with acute heart failure (4,435 pg/mL) than patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma exacerbation (536 pg/mL). In patients with acute-on-chronic heart failure, NT-proBNP levels were elevated in 91%, whereas clinical impression considered only 39% of cases as high likelihood for acute heart failure.
NT-proBNP may be a useful adjunct to standard clinical evaluation of dyspneic patients with previous obstructive airway disease.
我们评估氨基末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)检测结果,以及在评估既往患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘的呼吸困难患者时,将其与临床判断结果相结合的情况。
作为对先前从599名呼吸急促患者的便利样本中收集的观察数据的二次分析,根据NT-proBNP结果、临床印象及其最终诊断,对216名到急诊科就诊的既往患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘的患者进行了分析。对这些患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘的患者,整体以及有或无既往心力衰竭的患者,均检查了NT-proBNP的检测性能。使用受试者工作特征曲线,并作为NT-proBNP加临床评估的函数,将NT-proBNP结果与临床医生估计的心力衰竭可能性进行比较。最终诊断由2名对NT-proBNP不知情的独立心脏病专家根据60天随访期内的所有可用数据确定。
总体而言,55名患者(25%)患有急性心力衰竭;与无急性心力衰竭的患者相比,这些患者的NT-proBNP中位数更高(2238对178 pg/mL);对于年龄小于50岁的患者,使用450 pg/mL的切点,对于50岁及以上的患者,使用900 pg/mL的切点,敏感性为87%(95%置信区间[CI]72%至93%),特异性为84%(95%CI 76%至88%)。在无既往心力衰竭的患者(n=164)中,新发心力衰竭患者的NT-proBNP中位数水平也高于慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘加重患者(1561对168 pg/mL)。对急性心力衰竭的高度临床怀疑(概率>80%)仅检测出23%的新发心力衰竭患者,而这些患者中有82%的NT-proBNP水平升高。在既往有急性心力衰竭且患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘的患者(n=52)中,急性心力衰竭患者的NT-proBNP中位数水平(4435 pg/mL)显著高于慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘加重患者(536 pg/mL)。在慢性心力衰竭急性发作的患者中,91%的患者NT-proBNP水平升高,而临床印象仅将39%的病例视为急性心力衰竭的高可能性。
NT-proBNP可能是对既往患有阻塞性气道疾病的呼吸困难患者进行标准临床评估的有用辅助手段。