University of Pennsylvania.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Winter;12(4):665-78. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-665.
An assessment instrument is presented for the evaluation of the quantity and quality of dyadic interaction, as well as for the daily recording of behaviors presented and omitted which influence marital satisfaction. Comparison of data from ten happy couples and from ten couples entering therapy indicated two distinct dysfunctional patterns among distressed couples, with significantly different patterns of time-together and positive/negative ratios differentiating the happy versus therapy groups. Independent behavioral recording for 14 consecutive days significantly increased husband-wife agreement on a traditional adjustment questionnaire without significantly increasing or decreasing the level of satisfaction being assessed. There was no difference between groups as to interspousal agreement on amount of time together. However, the happy couples agreed on daily quality ratings of the 72 15-minute segments significantly more often than did the distressed couples. Couples at the extremes of the happy-distressed continuum reported rewarding and punishing, respectively, in response to the partners presence, regardless of behaviors emitted. Midrange happy couples defined "pleasant" as positive behaviors presented; midrange distressed couples defined "pleasant" as negative behaviors omitted. Theoretical and clinical implications of behavioral analysis of sequential patterns are discussed.
本文提出了一种评估对偶互动的数量和质量的评估工具,以及用于记录影响婚姻满意度的呈现和省略行为的日常记录。将十对幸福夫妇和十对进入治疗的夫妇的数据进行比较,结果表明,困扰夫妇存在两种明显不同的功能失调模式,在时间在一起和积极/消极比例方面存在显著差异,可将幸福组与治疗组区分开来。连续 14 天的独立行为记录显著提高了夫妻双方对传统调整问卷的一致性,而评估的满意度水平没有显著增加或减少。在夫妻双方对在一起的时间的一致性方面,各组之间没有差异。然而,幸福组在日常 72 个 15 分钟片段的质量评分上的一致性明显高于困扰组。处于幸福-困扰连续体两端的夫妇分别报告了对伴侣出现的奖励和惩罚,而不管发出了什么行为。中间范围的幸福夫妇将“愉快”定义为呈现的积极行为;中间范围的困扰夫妇将“愉快”定义为省略的消极行为。还讨论了序列模式的行为分析的理论和临床意义。