Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Spring;24(1):31-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-31.
A practical intervention program, targeting the safety belt use of pizza deliverers at two stores, increased significantly the use of both safety belts (143% above baseline) and turn signals (25% above baseline). Control subjects (i.e., pizza deliverers at a third no-intervention store and patrons driving to the pizza stores) showed no changes in belt or turn signal use over the course of 7-month study. The intervention program was staggered across two pizza stores and consisted of a group meeting wherein employees discussed the value of safety belts, received feedback regarding their low safety belt use, offered suggestions for increasing their belt use, and made a personal commitment to buckle up by signing buckle-up promise cards. Subsequently, employee-designed buckle-up reminder signs were placed in the pizza stores. By linking license plate numbers to individual driving records, we examined certain aspects of driving history as moderators of pre- and postintervention belt use. Although baseline belt use was significantly lower for drivers with one or more driving demerits or accidents in the previous 5 years, after the intervention these risk groups increased their belt use significantly and at the same rate as drivers with no demerits or accidents. Whereas baseline belt use was similar for younger (under 25) and older (25 or older) drivers, younger drivers were markedly more influenced by the intervention than were older drivers. Individual variation in belt use during baseline, intervention, and follow-up phases indicated that some drivers require more effective and costly intervention programs to motivate their safe driving practices.
针对两家门店的披萨配送员使用安全带的实用干预计划,显著增加了安全带的使用(比基线高 143%)和转向信号灯的使用(比基线高 25%)。控制组(即第三家未干预门店的披萨配送员和开车前往披萨店的顾客)在 7 个月的研究过程中,安全带或转向信号灯的使用没有任何变化。该干预计划在两家披萨店分阶段进行,包括一次小组会议,员工在会上讨论安全带的价值,收到有关安全带使用率低的反馈,提出增加安全带使用率的建议,并通过签署系安全带承诺卡来承诺系安全带。随后,员工设计的系安全带提醒标志被放置在披萨店内。通过将车牌号码与个人驾驶记录相关联,我们研究了驾驶历史的某些方面作为干预前后安全带使用的调节因素。尽管在过去 5 年内有一个或多个驾驶违章或事故的司机的基线安全带使用率明显较低,但在干预后,这些风险群体显著增加了安全带的使用,与没有违章或事故的司机的使用速度相同。虽然年轻(25 岁以下)和年长(25 岁或以上)司机的基线安全带使用率相似,但年轻司机受到干预的影响明显大于年长司机。在基线、干预和随访阶段安全带使用的个体差异表明,一些司机需要更有效和昂贵的干预计划来激励他们的安全驾驶行为。