Sterud Tom, Ekeberg Øivind, Hem Erlend
Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, PO Box 1111 Blindern, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 3;6:82. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-82.
Researchers have become increasingly aware that ambulance personnel may be at risk of developing work-related health problems. This article systematically explores the literature on health problems and work-related and individual health predictors in the ambulance services.
We identified the relevant empirical literature by searching several electronic databases including Medline, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and ISI Web of Science. Other relevant sources were identified through reference lists and other relevant studies known by the research group.
Forty-nine studies are included in this review. Our analysis shows that ambulance workers have a higher standardized mortality rate, higher level of fatal accidents, higher level of accident injuries and a higher standardized early retirement on medical grounds than the general working population and workers in other health occupations. Ambulance workers also seem to have more musculoskeletal problems than the general population. These conclusions are preliminary at present because each is based on a single study. More studies have addressed mental health problems. The prevalence of post-traumatic stress symptom caseness was > 20% in five of seven studies, and similarly high prevalence rates were reported for anxiety and general psychopathology in four of five studies. However, it is unclear whether ambulance personnel suffer from more mental health problems than the general working population.
Several indicators suggest that workers in the ambulance services experience more health problems than the general working population and workers in other health occupations. Several methodological challenges, such as small sample sizes, non-representative samples, and lack of comparisons with normative data limit the interpretation of many studies. More coordinated research and replication are needed to compare data across studies. We discuss some strategies for future research.
研究人员越来越意识到,救护车工作人员可能面临与工作相关的健康问题风险。本文系统地探讨了有关救护车服务中健康问题以及与工作相关和个体健康预测因素的文献。
我们通过检索多个电子数据库来识别相关的实证文献,这些数据库包括医学在线数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsychINFO)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)以及科学引文索引数据库(ISI Web of Science)。通过参考文献列表和研究团队知晓的其他相关研究来识别其他相关来源。
本综述纳入了49项研究。我们的分析表明,与一般工作人群和其他卫生职业的工作人员相比,救护车工作人员的标准化死亡率更高、致命事故发生率更高、事故伤害水平更高以及因健康原因提前退休的标准化比例更高。救护车工作人员似乎也比一般人群有更多的肌肉骨骼问题。目前这些结论是初步的,因为每项结论都基于一项单一研究。有更多研究探讨了心理健康问题。在七项研究中的五项中,创伤后应激症状病例的患病率超过20%,在五项研究中的四项中,焦虑和一般精神病理学的患病率也报告为同样高。然而,尚不清楚救护车工作人员是否比一般工作人群患有更多的心理健康问题。
几个指标表明,救护车服务工作人员比一般工作人群和其他卫生职业的工作人员经历更多的健康问题。一些方法学挑战,如样本量小、样本缺乏代表性以及缺乏与标准数据的比较,限制了许多研究的解释。需要更多协调一致的研究和重复研究来比较不同研究的数据。我们讨论了一些未来研究的策略。