Berman Daniel S, Hachamovitch Rory, Shaw Leslee J, Friedman John D, Hayes Sean W, Thomson Louise E J, Fieno David S, Germano Guido, Wong Nathan D, Kang Xingping, Rozanski Alan
Department of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Burns and Allen Research Institute, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.
J Nucl Med. 2006 Jul;47(7):1107-18.
This review deals with noninvasive imaging for risk stratification and with a conceptual approach to the selection of noninvasive tests in patients with suspected or known chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). Already widely acknowledged with SPECT, there is an increasing body of literature data demonstrating that CT coronary calcium assessment is also of prognostic value. The amount of coronary atherosclerosis, as can be extrapolated from CT coronary calcium score, has been shown to be highly predictive of cardiac events. The principal difference between myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) and CT coronary calcium for prognostic application appears to be that the former is an excellent tool for assessing short-term risk, thus effectively guiding decisions regarding revascularization. In contrast, the atherosclerosis imaging methods are likely to provide greater long-term risk assessment and, thus, are more useful in determination of the need for aggressive medical prevention measures. Although the more recent development of CT coronary angiography is promising for diagnosis, there has been no information to date regarding the prognostic value of the CT angiographic data. Similarly, cardiac MRI has not yet been adequately studied for its prognostic content. The selection of the most appropriate test for a given patient depends on the specific question being asked. In patients with a very low likelihood of CAD, no imaging test may be required. In screening the remaining asymptomatic patients, atherosclerosis imaging may be beneficial. In symptomatic patients, MPS, CT coronary angiography, and cardiac MRI play important roles. We consider it likely that, with an increased emphasis on prevention and a concomitant aging of the population, many forms of noninvasive cardiac imaging will continue to grow, with nuclear cardiology continuing to grow.
本综述涉及用于风险分层的无创成像以及疑似或已知慢性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者无创检查选择的概念性方法。CT冠状动脉钙化评估的预后价值已得到越来越多文献数据的证实,这一点已与单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)一样被广泛认可。从CT冠状动脉钙化评分推断出的冠状动脉粥样硬化程度已被证明对心脏事件具有高度预测性。心肌灌注SPECT(MPS)和CT冠状动脉钙化在预后应用中的主要区别似乎在于,前者是评估短期风险的优秀工具,从而能有效指导有关血运重建的决策。相比之下,动脉粥样硬化成像方法可能提供更大的长期风险评估,因此在确定是否需要积极的医学预防措施方面更有用。尽管CT冠状动脉造影的最新进展对诊断很有前景,但迄今为止尚无关于CT血管造影数据预后价值的信息。同样,心脏磁共振成像(MRI)的预后内容尚未得到充分研究。为特定患者选择最合适的检查取决于所提出的具体问题。在CAD可能性非常低的患者中,可能不需要进行成像检查。在筛查其余无症状患者时,动脉粥样硬化成像可能有益。在有症状的患者中,MPS、CT冠状动脉造影和心脏MRI发挥着重要作用。我们认为,随着对预防的日益重视以及人口老龄化,多种形式的无创心脏成像可能会继续发展,核心脏病学也将持续发展。