Suppr超能文献

开始和停止血液透析——肾病学家的观点、患者特征与实践模式之间的关联(来自透析结果与实践模式研究的数据)

Starting and withdrawing haemodialysis--associations between nephrologists' opinions, patient characteristics and practice patterns (data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study).

作者信息

Lambie Mark, Rayner Hugh C, Bragg-Gresham Jennifer L, Pisoni Ronald L, Andreucci Vittorio E, Canaud Bernard, Port Friedrich K, Young Eric W

机构信息

Department of Renal Medicine, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Oct;21(10):2814-20. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl339. Epub 2006 Jul 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence and prevalence of haemodialysis vary widely across countries. The variation may be attributable to differences in the incidence of end-stage renal disease and/or in the availability of haemodialysis. Previous studies have identified differences in nephrologists' opinions about the availability of haemodialysis and its appropriateness for patients with comorbidities. We studied the associations between nephrologists' opinions, availability of haemodialysis, patient characteristics and comorbidities, and facilities' withdrawal rates.

METHODS

Most of our analyses used data from 242 haemodialysis units in six countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK and the USA) in the first phase of the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS I). Opinions about access to and practice patterns in dialysis facilities, measured by the level of agreement with standardized statements, were collected from medical directors and nurse managers. A sub-analysis considered data from corresponding facilities in DOPPS II.

RESULTS

We found wide variations in the prevalence of waiting lists for new dialysis patients (UK 60%; USA 25%; Germany 0%; P < 0.05), in agreement with starting haemodialysis for patients with advanced age, dementia and comorbidities (UK, France < USA < other countries; P < 0.05), and in agreement with withdrawing dialysis (other countries < UK/USA; P < 0.05). The estimated glomerular filtration rate at the start of dialysis was not significantly different in units with waiting lists. Significant associations were found between nephrologists' opinions and the odds of patients being > or =80 years old, and between opinions and the rate and relative risk of withdrawal of haemodialysis. No significant associations were found between opinions and patients' comorbidities or dependency.

CONCLUSION

Differences within and across countries in nephrologists' opinions regarding starting and withdrawing haemodialysis reflect differences in access to haemodialysis and the practice of withdrawal of haemodialysis in their facilities.

摘要

背景

血液透析的发病率和患病率在各国之间差异很大。这种差异可能归因于终末期肾病发病率的差异和/或血液透析的可及性差异。先前的研究已经发现,肾病学家对于血液透析可及性及其对合并症患者适用性的看法存在差异。我们研究了肾病学家的看法、血液透析的可及性、患者特征和合并症以及机构撤机率之间的关联。

方法

我们的大多数分析使用了来自六个国家(法国、德国、意大利、西班牙、英国和美国)242个血液透析单位在透析结局与实践模式研究(DOPPS I)第一阶段的数据。通过对标准化陈述的同意程度来衡量的关于透析机构的准入和实践模式的看法,是从医疗主任和护士长那里收集的。一项子分析考虑了DOPPS II中相应机构的数据。

结果

我们发现,新透析患者等候名单的患病率差异很大(英国60%;美国25%;德国0%;P<0.05),对于高龄、痴呆和合并症患者开始血液透析的同意程度存在差异(英国、法国<美国<其他国家;P<0.05),以及对于撤机的同意程度存在差异(其他国家<英国/美国;P<0.05)。有等候名单的单位在透析开始时的估计肾小球滤过率没有显著差异。在肾病学家的看法与患者年龄≥80岁的几率之间,以及在看法与血液透析撤机率和相对风险之间,发现了显著关联。在看法与患者的合并症或依赖程度之间未发现显著关联。

结论

各国之间以及各国国内肾病学家对于开始和停止血液透析的看法差异,反映了其所在机构在血液透析可及性和血液透析撤机实践方面的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验