Flexible versus nonflexible mitral valve rings for congestive heart failure: differential durability of repair.

BACKGROUND

Surgical intervention is playing an increasingly important therapeutic role in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients with ischemia and dilated cardiomyopathy. Their mitral regurgitation (MR) is a result of left ventricular (LV) geometrical distortion. The optimal type of ring for CHF patients with geometric ventricular-based MR is unknown. This study reviewed the results of flexible versus nonflexible complete mitral valve rings in CHF patients with geometric mitral regurgitation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using a prospectively maintained database, patients undergoing mitral valve reconstruction (MVR) with either a flexible or nonflexible complete ring were identified on the basis of preoperative ejection fraction (EF) < or = 30% and no primary mitral pathology. These 2 groups of CHF patients with severe geometric MR were then compared in terms of recurrent MR requiring reoperation. Between 1992 and 2004, 289 patients with EF < or = 30%, received an undersized complete mitral annuloplasty ring as their MVR procedure. Of these, 170 patients had a flexible complete ring. In follow-up, 16 "flexible" patients (9.4%) required a repeat procedure for significant recurrent geometric MR and CHF (10 replacements, 3 re-repairs, 3 transplants). The average time to reoperation was 2.4 years. In contrast, 119 patients with an EF < or = 30% received a MVR using an undersized nonflexible complete ring. Only 3 "non-flexible" patients required a repeat operation, MVR (1), and 2 patients required a transplant. The time to reoperation was 4.0 years. A significant difference in reoperation rates, for recurrent MR, between the 2 groups (P=0.012). There were no differences between groups, in terms of age, ring size used, preoperative EF, LV size, MR grade, or New York Heart Association class.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CHF having a flexible ring have a higher likelihood of developing recurrent MR requiring reoperation. The use of a nonflexible ring appears to significantly reduce the need for repeat surgical procedures. Further refinement and development of nonflexible ring systems, aimed at LV restoration, deserve ongoing investigation.