Suppr超能文献

执行注意功能障碍对有检查症状的强迫症患者与有洗涤症状的强迫症患者情景记忆的不同影响。

The differential impact of executive attention dysfunction on episodic memory in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients with checking symptoms vs. those with washing symptoms.

作者信息

Omori Ichiro M, Murata Yoshie, Yamanishi Tomoaki, Nakaaki Shutaro, Akechi Tatsuo, Mikuni Masahiko, Furukawa Toshiaki A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2007 Nov;41(9):776-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.05.005. Epub 2006 Jul 7.

Abstract

Neuropsychological studies of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have pointed to memory and attention deficits among its sufferers, but these reports have largely ignored the possibility that cognitive disturbances may vary across OCD clinical subtypes, or that their interactions may differ between subtypes. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether "checkers" and "washers" demonstrate differences in their memory and executive attention function. Fifty-three outpatients with primary DSM-IV diagnosis of OCD with typical checking (n=27) or washing (n=26) rituals participated in the study. Patients were administered the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery to assess executive attention function. Various neuropsychological tests were then subjected to factor analysis. Neuropsychological test results and obtained factor scores were compared between "washers" and "checkers". Effects of these factor scores on memory by OCD subtypes were examined. No significant difference in terms of demographic and clinical variables was found between the two groups. Checkers displayed performance deficits on Stroop test, Trail Making Test, GO/NO GO test (commission errors) and category fluency. Three factors, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and multi-tasking, were obtained. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups on the inhibition and the cognitive flexibility scores, but not on the general memory or the multi-tasking score. There was a statistically significant interaction between groups and the inhibition score. Only among "checkers", a significant correlation was noted between the inhibition factor and the general memory, while no such correlation was observed among "washers". Among "checkers", poor general memory was related to inhibition deficits.

摘要

强迫症(OCD)的神经心理学研究表明,患者存在记忆和注意力缺陷,但这些报告在很大程度上忽略了认知障碍可能因OCD临床亚型而异,或者它们在不同亚型之间的相互作用可能不同的可能性。本研究的目的是确定“检查者”和“洗涤者”在记忆和执行注意力功能方面是否存在差异。五十三名主要根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)诊断为患有典型检查(n = 27)或洗涤(n = 26)仪式的强迫症门诊患者参与了该研究。对患者进行了韦氏记忆量表修订版测试和一套全面的神经心理学测试,以评估执行注意力功能。然后对各种神经心理学测试进行因子分析。比较了“洗涤者”和“检查者”之间的神经心理学测试结果和获得的因子得分。研究了这些因子得分对OCD各亚型记忆的影响。两组在人口统计学和临床变量方面未发现显著差异。检查者在斯特鲁普测验(Stroop test)、连线测验(Trail Making Test)、Go/No Go测验(错误率)和类别流畅性测试中表现出缺陷。提取了抑制、认知灵活性和多任务处理三个因子。两组在抑制得分和认知灵活性得分上存在统计学显著差异,但在一般记忆得分或多任务处理得分上没有差异。组与抑制得分之间存在统计学显著的交互作用。仅在“检查者”中,抑制因子与一般记忆之间存在显著相关性,而在“洗涤者”中未观察到这种相关性。在“检查者”中,较差的一般记忆与抑制缺陷有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验