Daly Janis J, Sng Karen, Roenigk Kristen, Fredrickson Eric, Dohring Mark
Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Gait Posture. 2007 Mar;25(3):412-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.007. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
Purpose one was to characterize the consistency of intra-limb hip/knee (H/K) coordination according to a measure of average coefficient of correspondence (ACC) across strides. Purpose two was to investigate H/K ACC validity and ability to discriminate pre-/post-treatment change in stroke survivors.
Five healthy controls and 32 chronic (>12 mos) stroke survivors were enrolled, and H/K ACC was calculated for both groups. Comparison between controls and stroke was made using the Mann-Whitney Test. Convergent validity of H/K ACC was tested using the Pearson Correlation model with gait speed and the 6 min Walk Test (6MWT). Stroke survivors were randomized to either: (1) gait training with functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) using intramuscular (IM) electrodes or (2) gait training without FNS. Both groups had treatment 1.5 h/day, 5 days/week, for 12 weeks, including .5 h coordination exercise, .5 h body weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT), and .5 h over ground gait training. The FNS-IM group used FNS-IM for all treatment components; the No-FNS group did not. Pre-/post-treatment comparisons were made using ANOVA.
H/K ACC detected a significant difference between controls versus stroke involved limb (p=.0001) and controls versus stroke uninvolved limb (p=.042). The H/K ACC measure was well-correlated with gait speed (r=.70) and 6MWT (r=.69). H/K ACC showed a significant treatment response to FNS-IM (p=.003), but not No-FNS (p=.747).
H/K ACC sensitively discriminated between controls versus stroke involved or uninvolved limbs. H/K ACC was valid, with significant correlations with both walking speed and 6MWT. FNS-IM produced a significant gain in H/K ACC, and No-FNS did not.
目的一是根据跨步幅的平均对应系数(ACC)来描述肢体内部髋/膝(H/K)协调性的一致性。目的二是研究H/K ACC在中风幸存者治疗前后变化的有效性及辨别能力。
招募了5名健康对照者和32名慢性(>12个月)中风幸存者,计算两组的H/K ACC。使用曼-惠特尼检验对对照组和中风组进行比较。使用皮尔逊相关模型检验H/K ACC与步速和6分钟步行试验(6MWT)的收敛效度。中风幸存者被随机分为:(1)使用肌内(IM)电极进行功能性神经肌肉刺激(FNS)的步态训练;(2)不进行FNS的步态训练。两组均每天治疗1.5小时,每周5天,共12周,包括0.5小时的协调性训练、0.5小时的减重平板训练(BWSTT)和0.5小时的地面步态训练。FNS-IM组在所有治疗环节均使用FNS-IM;无FNS组则不使用。治疗前后的比较采用方差分析。
H/K ACC检测出对照组与中风受累肢体之间存在显著差异(p = 0.0001),以及对照组与中风未受累肢体之间存在显著差异(p = 0.042)。H/K ACC测量值与步速(r = 0.70)和6MWT(r = 0.69)高度相关。H/K ACC对FNS-IM显示出显著的治疗反应(p = 0.003),但对无FNS组则无显著反应(p = 0.747)。
H/K ACC能够敏感地区分对照组与中风受累或未受累肢体。H/K ACC是有效的,与步行速度和6MWT均有显著相关性。FNS-IM使H/K ACC有显著提高,而无FNS组则没有。